![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Guy buys oversized card, trims it to an accepted industry size , gets it graded, sells it. Where is the crime? Did any of the sale ads say it was or wasn’t altered? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
If you think this is acceptable.... |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Now that's funny. Like selling a stolen bike and saying that the ad didn't say it wasn't stolen.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Or a car with a turned back odometer, without saying whether it had been turned back or not. Nope, no crime there.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Stealing a bike is a crime though. Rolling back or "clocking" an odometer is also a crime. Trimming a baseball card is not. It's just a shitty thing to do because the majority of people in this hobby have decided that they don't like it. I don't think these comparisons are equivalent.
If the hobby majority suddenly changed its mind tomorrow by shrugging their shoulders and accepting the fact that most trimming is undetectable and therefore not worth worrying about, then there wouldn't even be an argument at all for charging someone with a crime. There's a fine line between someone leeching off of an industry by exploiting a loophole in the system and someone committing an actual crime, even if that leeching behavior is viewed as scummy and unethical. I've been saying since the beginning that trimming cards for profit falls under the scummy and unethical behavior bucket, but that doesn't make it a crime. It is not against the law to profit from being a scumbag, as evidenced by the fact that over priced magazine sales scammers still come to our doors every year with completely fabricated sob stories about needing "points" to get them into college. I also collect rare casino and poker chips. In that hobby, everyone cleans and restores their chips with all sorts of various chemicals and oils. Many also remove the original casino inlays and replace them with new inlays. People even "trim" their chips by running the edges through a lathe to make them new and shiny again with sharp edges. In the comic book world, you can pay CGC to restore your comics. They will remove creases and surface wrinkles for a fee. The only difference I see between these actions and that of trimming cards is the percentage of collectors who give them a green light in their respective hobbies. Yet, in this hobby, PSA does not disclose if a card was soaked in order to remove glue from the back, nor do any sellers I've ever encountered. Yet that is without question an alteration as well. I can't tell you how many times I've bought a card only to have it show up in a PSA slab with glue residue on the back that wasn't visible from the scans. Same with tape removal. They'll grade a card that has had tape removed despite the fact that someone either soaked the card in a solvent or used a scalpel and a hair dryer to get it off the card.
__________________
If it's not perfectly centered, I probably don't want it. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is true.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Rolling back or "clocking" an odometer= trimming. To me, at least.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well, if you trim a card and then sell it without disclosure it is fraud and may rise to the level of criminal fraud. If you mailed it or used electronic communications it may also be mail fraud or wire fraud, both crimes. Besides, is the metric so low in this hobby that criminality is now the line we draw when assessing the actions of others?
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 05-02-2023 at 04:36 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Nothing was stolen. Only a guy that “may” have trimmed a card within spec of accepted size. If it’s still within the correct size what crime was committed? Undersized and graded is another story…. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In the hobby I grew up in, trimming an oversized (or pressed out and therefore oversized) card down to spec was never viewed as legitimate. Either edges are factory or they aren't.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 05-02-2023 at 09:39 PM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
35 years ago I ran into a huge dealer in central Ohio that had an Xacto table in his back room. He would go through boxes of oversized vintage cards and “clean” them up for sale. I about fell over when I saw his operation. Never bought another thing from him again…. He was trimming every single card that came through oversized. He also ripped up every undersized card and threw it in the trash regardless of value. It was a disgusting sight. His stuff, his choice. My choice was never buy or sell there ever again. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
It just depends on if they are "friends" with the card fixer or not if you get offended. Seen it on here many times. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
That's cute. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
This also touches on why PSA does not, and surely cannot, if they wish to remain in business, honor a grade guarantee for cards that do not bare actual observable evidence of trimming regardless of whether or not someone on Blowout believes they've found before and after scans of the card in question. In the real world, we have to deal with observable evidence and make determinations about the likelihood of a card's edges being factory cut or not. Ultimately, this is what determines a card's market value; whether or not it bares evidence of trimming, not whether or not it has in fact been trimmed. This is true in both directions. You can open a brand new pack of cards and receive one with a botched edge from factory that the TPGs will not grade because the card bares evidence of having been "trimmed" despite the fact that it came that way from the factory. It is not unfair or disingenuous to point out that all cards have been trimmed by a blade. Unfortunately, what determines a card's actual market value is not whether or not it has a factory edge, but rather whether or not its edges appear "correct". This is why some factory cut cards get rejected and why many trimmed cards do not. A card's edge looks "trimmed" or "wrong" when it looks botched, either by an amateur trimmer or by a factory mishap. The idea that all factory edges look a particular way and that all trimmed edges look a different way is simply not true, and one that is born out of ignorance. It is also not true that factory cut cards measure 2.5" x 3.5" and that trimmed cards are by definition smaller than that. Again, ignorance and faulty assumptions beget that belief. When one of these professional trimmers trims a card, and that card still measures within spec, the resulting card does not have a loss of value on the open market because it does not bare any actual evidence of trimming (i.e., the edges look correct), and the actualized market values are based entirely on what can be observed, not on that which is unknowable. This is also why PSA rejects grade guarantees for a lot of these cards that get called out on Blowout and sent back in for review. They simply bare no physical evidence of trimming. The edges look correct and the card measures correctly as well. Any buyer of one of these cards could crack it out and resubmit it and receive a numeric grade again from any TPG at any time. They are not actually out any money. It's difficult to make a case for fraud when the buyer's bottom line has not actually been adversely affected.
__________________
If it's not perfectly centered, I probably don't want it. Last edited by Snowman; 05-03-2023 at 01:02 PM. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So Travis, if I can make a perfect duplicate of a Rolex that no expert can detect, and sell it as the real thing, and the buyer could sell it without detection for full Rolex value, no fraud?
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 05-03-2023 at 01:28 PM. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
But again, you're analogy is flawed. You're talking about counterfeiting an item, not restoring one. In this case, a better analogy would be if you had a Rolex with a scratched face and you buffed out the flaw and sold it without telling the buyer that you buffed out a scratch. Perhaps the buyer wouldn't be excited to learn that, but he still has a Rolex and it's still worth every penny that he paid for it. That's not fraud.
__________________
If it's not perfectly centered, I probably don't want it. Last edited by Snowman; 05-03-2023 at 01:32 PM. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I had one of those Psssst guys try and sell me a "Rolex" on the streets of Amsterdam many years ago. I believe he wanted 50 Guilder at the time. It looked to be far from a perfect duplicate. Pretty sure there was fraud involved.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Now if you said that PSA or SGC or Beckett Can't tell from a cursory 30 second look, that I could agree with. If you look at the work done by groups and people that actually know what they're doing and take the time to get it right You'll see what's possible. Do things slip through? Of course, but far less than they do at any grading company. I may just have to use the method in the video and take good pics of the resulting edge compared to a factory edge. I believe it will be 100% detectable. The same for his half assed "reglossing" using wax paper. That should be and is entirely detectable if you take any time at all. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The part I made bold is ALL that matters and it is fairly easy to get altered/counterfeit cards in those magic plastic slabs and it HAS been proven countless times. |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What you just described is a crime. In the scenario, the alterer is required to disclose he altered them.
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Fraud 101 -- intentional nondisclosure/concealment of a material fact, in order to induce a sale at a higher price.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Every hobby has it’s maneuverers. It comes down to caveat emptor….. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
My “argument” is that a card trimmed to proper size isn’t fraud. It’s just a shitty thing to do. |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My understanding is that the FBI investigation was not just for trimmed cards, but trimmed cards that somehow were slabbed and given something other than the Scarlet 'A'. If the trimmers were working in cahoots with the TPAs to have them turn the other way on the alterations, then that is another story and something that should be investigated and prosecuted.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-91) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Ahh, I get it. You're just taking jhe piss with us, right?
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 05-03-2023 at 07:20 AM. |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm not a doctor (of cards), or a lawyer, but my question is who is the person that broke the law? If you have a card in your personal collection that you purchased in a TPG holder and you sell it, but it is later discovered that the card was trimmed, did you commit a crime by simply selling an unknowingly altered card? If it's the unknowing owner of the card that sold it, I fear most collectors that own purchased high graded TPG cards and ever sell them could be criminally prosecuted for committing a crime they didn't even realize was happening. If it was the trimmer who originally trimmed the card, how do you prove who that was, unless they were dumb enough to video themselves trimming the card, I don't see how it could be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that any certain person trimmed a certain card.
I don't foresee anyone ever actually getting prosecuted for these crimes, because it appears that the person who could be convicted in most cases is in reality an innocent person, whereas the true guilty party that has committed a crime, is committing a crime that is virtually impossible to prove. If you extend the guilt to all people that were in the chain of ownership of the card, then you are going to have an awful long list of people and not very many left in the hobby that couldn't be named at some point in a court case. In my opinion the true crime that was committed was done by the TPG company that gave the card a numerical grade. These companies were providing a service for a fee to detect these altered cards and have truly failed the entire hobby with the service they have provided. I look at one card in particular that I am personally experienced with, the 1968 O-Pee-Chee Billy Williams card. These were all factory mis-cut cards from the factory, not a couple sheets of them, but every single one of them due to their positioning on the sheet and the sheet cutting technology that was used at the time. PSA has however given a numerical graded to a handful of these cards over the years. I have personally seen and looked at a few of these PSA graded cards, and every last one of them is factory mis-cut short, along with every one of the hundreds of raw one's that I have looked at over the last decade. This is a case of PSA failing to do the job they were paid to do. I'm not sure that the trimming of cards is more rampant in the hobby today than it ever was, the difference today from 1980 is today we have trusted? companies making huge profits off of collectors for doing a sub-par job of detecting these altered cards. |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
A person has a card, alters the card, and then sells the card (take grading out of it). How is this a crime? Unethical, yes, but a crime? And please don't bring up Maestro. He was not convicted of altering a card (that is a myth). While I hate this subject as much as other collectors, throwing around the word crime for something that it is not is frustrating. |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
How many times do I have to explain this going all the way back to 2019? I give up. Think whatever you want, ignorance is bliss as they say. And yes, while not the main focus of the case, if you actually read the Mastro indictment (to which he pled guilty) part of it is selling the Wagner without disclosure that it was altered. Not myth, fact.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 05-03-2023 at 11:12 AM. |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() Regardless, I can be convinced that trimming is truly illegal. Possible to point me in the direction of a trimmer be convicted specifically of card trimming? Not looking for convoluted TPG, shilling scams. An actual straightforward case of a guy trimmed a card, didn’t disclose, then sold it for profit….? |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT: Looking for Input on Card Doctoring Trends | marzoumanian | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 11-27-2021 12:00 PM |
Card doctoring debacle | Snapolit1 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 34 | 07-10-2019 11:36 AM |
Card doctoring... | Peter_Spaeth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 142 | 01-25-2018 12:52 PM |
Speaking of card doctoring... | seablaster | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 12-01-2012 07:10 PM |
What Do You Consider Card Doctoring? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 58 | 05-15-2008 11:44 AM |