![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
As to your other points, color fake fro joys, trimmed T206 Wagners and T206 impossible front back combinations existed well before the grading companies, they existed for sale on the internet, in autions and at card shows before grading companies. That goes for any and all fradulantly produced or altered cards. The Pete Rose rookie counterfeits that flooded the market came well before grading companies. The grading companies IMO have done a great job at weeding out many, upon many of these fake, fraudulant and altered cards from the market. Are they perfect, of course not. But they have eliminated tons of these types of cards from the market and for that I think they should be commended. With any grading/authentication system cards will slip through the system. I think the number of cards that correctly get rejected for being fake, trimmed and altered far out number the cards that slip through the system. And IMO that is a huge benefit to the hobby and collectors. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Sorry to differ with you regarding your above statement. The T206 impossible front/back combos are a relatively recent phenomena. A bunch of the "re-fronted" fakes surfaced circa 1999-2000. These fake cards were modified by professional paper restorer(s) to the extent that they fooled PSA and SGC graders. Here are some examples of these T206 impossible front/back fakes that have been graded in the past 12 years...... Green Cobb / Red HINDU Matty portrait / Red HINDU Cobb (bat off shoulder) / PIEDMONT 150 Joe Doyle N.Y. Nat'l / POLAR BEAR Green Cobb / CYCLE 350 ...... this one recently sold for $3000 in an auction This is just a sample, as there are quite a few more, and perhaps others on this forum will identify more of them. P.S. Quite a number of collectors payed some big $$$$ for some of these cards, having trusted the TPG's. And, as is noted in the last example.... there are still a few of these fakes in circulation. TED Z |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Similarly, what is scary is that many of these were called out due to their front/back combos being impossible, not due to catching the alteration. How many cards (slabbed or raw) are deemed to be authentic simply because the front/back combo is possible, yet the card has been altered to make a more desirable (expensive) front/back combination?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You may fault TPG for grading impossible front/back combinations.
But can you imagine how many more fraudulent cards would be in circulation if it wasn't for TPG?
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
People became more condition sensitive after TPGs came around imo. I don't think there'd be much of a reason to try to alter a card that already appears mint without the TPGs... So maybe less fakes being bought by hobby newcomers, but, maybe more cards being altered for a slightly better grade. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Same grade upgrade | ChiefBenderForever | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-19-2011 12:45 PM |
Strip Card Grading, Authentic vs. Low Grade | abothebear | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-16-2011 08:23 PM |
Many Graded 1950's-1980's High Grade F/S Final reduction before Ebay... | btcarfagno | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 13 | 07-23-2010 06:55 PM |
High grade cards are undervalued | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 66 | 08-26-2005 03:37 PM |
Strongly against the "Authentic" grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-01-2002 11:30 AM |