![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Certainly didn't mean to offend, nor was I judging, and certainly not saying you trimmed the card.
All I was saying was it 'seems' as though it came back with a grade far off from what you agree with (hence starting a thread) I ve never sent a card in for regrade, I generally only buy a graded card if I actually agree with the grade it has, that way I avoid overpaying... Too much risk buying a card you think is under graded, then you find a flaw, and realize you're stuck with something you didn't want. So no, I don't crack slabs. That said, I think the way you present your cards is wonderful! I was simply trying, in my limited estimating skills, to guess an appropriate grade, which I said was either auth if deemed trimmed, or 2 if deemed factory cut |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() I was simply curious if anyone else thought (as I did) that this card deserved a numerical grade ? And, I say this strictly for the following 2 reasons...... Since this T206 has an AMERICAN BEAUTY (AB) back, how can SGC discern that it was trimmed ? Considering the fact that there is no consistency in the dimensions of AB cards. Furthermore, I've seen many, many AB cards in the past 32 years that I've been collecting T206's. Occasionally, some of them do have rough Factory-cuts very similar to this card. Some of these rough-cut cards have been assigned numerical grades by PSA or SGC. Anyhow, you (and a number of responses here) have guessed correctly that it was graded an "A". ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks for everyone's responses. TED Z Last edited by tedzan; 05-21-2012 at 01:25 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey guys
Some here may be annoyed if I prolong this "game"; and then, others here will be happy to continue playing this game. So for the latter, I am posting two more of my AMERICAN BEAUTY's for you to guess their grades (A .... 10 >> 60). ![]() Thanx for your consideration, TED Z |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I'm going to say PSA 2(mc) on the left, and PSA 1 poor on the right |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() SGC 3 Gandil and SGC 1.5 Chance Last edited by Pup6913; 05-22-2012 at 02:02 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ted as a big obsessive collector of AB backed t205's I have seen several that have some weird cuts and always seem to be on the upper right side of the cards. My latest is a SGC 70/5.5 AB Mattern. Has the same weird cut that looks like a trim job. See the scans on the pickups post. Don't know if you can see but I am away right now or I would scan it and post it
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
T206Resource.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() TED Z |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great cards, Ted.
Looking forward to seeing Gandil get a chance to "breathe." Or has he already been freed? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
TPG has ruined the hobby
+1 |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Same grade upgrade | ChiefBenderForever | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-19-2011 12:45 PM |
Strip Card Grading, Authentic vs. Low Grade | abothebear | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-16-2011 08:23 PM |
Many Graded 1950's-1980's High Grade F/S Final reduction before Ebay... | btcarfagno | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 13 | 07-23-2010 06:55 PM |
High grade cards are undervalued | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 66 | 08-26-2005 03:37 PM |
Strongly against the "Authentic" grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-01-2002 11:30 AM |