 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
05-20-2012, 03:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
since no name of tpg was given...i'd go PRO 8
|
|
#2
05-20-2012, 04:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
05-21-2012, 08:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't think the marks at left center on the front are a scuff. Looks more like a bit of stray red ink.
If the two discolored areas in the top border aren't paper loss, I think the grades mentioned so far are a bit harsh. While the rough cut probably sent it into the A category, if it didn't I'd say maybe a 40/3 I understand why they won't give numbers to cards with rough factory cuts or factory but undersize cards, but I really wish they did, maybe with a qualifier. (Yea, some bias. My two that were rejected were one rough cut and one undersize. except they accepted a non AB that was AB narrow and more undersize than the one that was rejected.  )Steve B
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Same grade upgrade | ChiefBenderForever | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-19-2011 12:45 PM |
| Strip Card Grading, Authentic vs. Low Grade | abothebear | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-16-2011 08:23 PM |
| Many Graded 1950's-1980's High Grade F/S Final reduction before Ebay... | btcarfagno | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 13 | 07-23-2010 06:55 PM |
| High grade cards are undervalued | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 66 | 08-26-2005 03:37 PM |
| Strongly against the "Authentic" grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-01-2002 11:30 AM |
Hybrid Mode
