|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scott- did you see the one where the Mackenzie brothers put a baby mouse in an empty beer bottle, let it grow to maturity, then filled the bottle with beer and recapped it, returned it to the company for a refund, and then got a whole case of beer back as part of the company's apology? Pretty funny.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
How long before the card gets listed on ebay? I can't wait to see the description. Here is a bogus graded Wagner :
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Honus-Wagner...#ht_789wt_1185 $200? |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ur0g-R7ZODY |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
JimB |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"
How long before the card gets listed on ebay? I can't wait to see the description. Here is a bogus graded Wagner : http://www.ebay.com/itm/Honus-Wagner...#ht_789wt_1185 $200?"" LOL that one looks more convincing than the straight up fake cincy card. Both are fake. But damn that cincy one is nasty fake. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
-
Last edited by Vintagedegu; 08-21-2014 at 03:35 PM. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
While I'm skeptical also, I'd still like to compare the lithogrpahic dot pattern under my 16x loupe, or better yet, a microscope with the proper power, to a known genuine card, or series of such cards. Simply stated, that should tell if the card is counterfeit or not. If it is not counterfeit, but there remain significant differences with regard to other characteristics of the card, then the card is something other than a regular T206, and the question becomes what it is. The grading service which has in fact encasulated it has assigned it a category, which may or may not be correct. Barry is quite correct--we need to know how they arrived at that conclusion, assuming the card passed the former test. One thing does concern me, however.
I've taken hundreds of depostions in my career as a lawyer, many of them involving scammers of one kind or another, and these two are simply not behaving in a way that is consistent with the behavior these types of persons do exhibit. Perhaps if I saw the card in person and could examine it, I would have a somewhat different opinion, but the animosity towards these two seems to have grown out of hand. Best regards, regardless of our different sentiments here, Larry Last edited by ls7plus; 10-09-2011 at 01:25 AM. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Larry, it's been examined by an auction house owner, forensic expert and now a grading company (with a combined 39yrs experience) from a sophisticated province in Canada.
Theyve jumped through hoops to protect the prospective buyer. What more can we expect from these good fellows? |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
but anyone that needs magnification to judge that cards legitimacy needs a new hobby.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gotta agree with Glyn. From the naked eye, the card not only appears fake, but is OBVIOUSLY fake. "Unreleased Version"? HA. I find it funny that the first of the "unreleased versions" to be discovered, just so happens to be Wagner. Even if it really is an "unreleased version"(cough), it's still worthless if they can't get anyone to believe them... This card is not and never will be an "unreleased version", a "t206 Wagner", or anything else that you can think of. Hell, it's not even a standard reprint, or just another scam(they've taken it way past that point).. It is "the Cobb/Edwards Wagner", and that's all this card will EVER be... And to top it off these two douchebags had the audacity to play the race card against the hobby, it's experts, and whoever else will listen in regards to this card. These two know it's fake(and probably have all along), and since they couldn't get anyone to side with them, they've been hoping to guilt someone into buying their BS. They can shove it up their @$$es...Which should be even more enjoyable now that it's been slabbed..
Sorry, if I come off a little angry, but I take this hobby seriously(well, about as seriously as it could be taken), and I've had about enough of hearing about these two clowns. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I suspect the next step is this card will be consigned to one of those marginal country auctions, one with a "no returns, all sales are final" policies. And you just know someone will buy it, figuring if it is real he will get it cheap and make a killing on it. And then you will never hear from these two guys again. That will be the end of their days in the public eye.
Last edited by barrysloate; 10-10-2011 at 06:04 AM. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Sounds like the business model of Coaches Corner -- get a BS authentication and then sell the item for a small percentage of what it would be worth if it was authentic to an unsuspecting wet-behind-the-ears novice who thinks he made a killing. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
They've created their own reality distortion field.
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I'm sorry to be blunt and not sugar-coat it, but sometimes it's necessary to tell it like it is. Here's hoping we all prefer to keep our minds open and stay objective, Larry Last edited by ls7plus; 10-15-2011 at 07:02 PM. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Larry, did you happen to notice the scans Leon posted for me? That is the same reprint these two guys have, it was made back in the 70's supposedly, as I was told by the dealer who gave it to me. I've had mine since 1991 and it was old looking then. I have 656 real t206's and my Wagner, which looks exactly like their Wagner, does not look like any of those real t206's. There is no doubt it is a fake card, the back looks real but the front has so many problems it's literally unreal.
Trust me when I say this, I dont like work that much, if I had a real Wagner I wouldn't have it anymore and I certainly wouldn't have a job. Well, I would still be a writer but I wouldn't be working at a restaurant too. These guys do not have anything except the same reprint I've had for 20 years. If someone now wants to believe because an unknown grading company gave their word it's real, let me know, I'll sell mine for one dollar less than whatever 6 figure price you'd pay for the other one. Reminded me just now that back in the day an unknown grading company graded a Mathewson reprint as real and then came on the board trying to defend their position...we never heard from them again. I suspect the same thing will happen with this company edit: I have a good memory from 9 years ago, proof that I've been around here waaay too long http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...son+grade+tech
__________________
Please check out my books on baseball history. They include the bio of star second baseman Dots Miller. A book featuring 20 Moonlight Graham players who got into just one game. Another with 13 players who were with the Pittsburgh Pirates during the regular season, but never played a game. There's also one about 27 baseball families, as well as a day-by-day look at the worst team in Pittsburgh Pirates history. All five can be found here: https://www.amazon.com/stores/John-D...hor/B0DH87Q2DS Last edited by z28jd; 10-15-2011 at 07:18 PM. Reason: felt like it |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If I remember correctly, wasn't that what Dan Mathewson got all upset about and disappeared over?
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Recent passing of a relative of Honus Wagner! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-14-2011 11:43 PM |
| another wagner going on the block | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-15-2008 07:21 PM |
| Wagner HBO Real Sports...what do you think? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 08-24-2006 01:05 PM |
| meant to follow up on the Wagner thread-- Context | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 09-06-2005 07:37 PM |
| Cobb vs. Wagner | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 90 | 07-03-2005 11:50 AM |