 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Is it ethical to alter and sell cards without disclosing that they were altered? | |||
| Yes, it is perfectly acceptable and ethical to sell an altered without disclosing this to the buyer |
   
|
5 | 4.24% |
| No, it is unethical to not disclose alterations the alterations |
  
|
34 | 28.81% |
| No, it is unethical to not disclose the alterations, and it is fraud to do so |
  
|
79 | 66.95% |
| Voters: 118. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#37
03-20-2024, 10:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I have a T206 that I asked Ted Zanidakis to sign on the back. He did sign, and sent it back to me. So... Ted altered the card??? I'm complicit to that??? If I sell that card to someone, it's pretty obvious that Ted Z signed the back. I need to disclose that to a buyer anyway??? IF, in the process of taking scissors to a over-taped mailing package that I get one day, in the process of using the scissors, I cut a T206 in half, if I then sell that card, am I committing fraud if I don't tell the buyer that I cut that card in half???
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ethical to sell 1952 Mantle PSA 8 uncracked case | 1952boyntoncollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 96 | 02-23-2015 11:04 AM |
| So much for REA disclosure on T206s... | CMIZ5290 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 82 | 04-30-2014 12:44 PM |
| Photo cleaning disclosure | 71buc | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 6 | 12-18-2012 08:40 AM |
| B&L Auction Disclosure | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 77 | 05-21-2008 09:08 PM |
| disclosure issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 05-31-2007 06:45 PM |
Threaded Mode