 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Is it ethical to alter and sell cards without disclosing that they were altered? | |||
| Yes, it is perfectly acceptable and ethical to sell an altered without disclosing this to the buyer |
   
|
5 | 4.24% |
| No, it is unethical to not disclose alterations the alterations |
  
|
34 | 28.81% |
| No, it is unethical to not disclose the alterations, and it is fraud to do so |
  
|
79 | 66.95% |
| Voters: 118. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
03-21-2024, 06:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
OK here are two more ethical or not questions like all the other examples in this thread....
If you sent a card to PSA and Beckett and both times it came back as trimmed and a third time sent to SGC and gets a numeric grade of 6, 7 whatever, would you have to disclose the two trimmed results when selling the SGC card? OR, if you cracked out a PSA 4 and resubmitted and got a 7 the second time , would you need to disclose that it was previously a PSA 4 and now its a 7? 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ethical to sell 1952 Mantle PSA 8 uncracked case | 1952boyntoncollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 96 | 02-23-2015 11:04 AM |
| So much for REA disclosure on T206s... | CMIZ5290 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 82 | 04-30-2014 12:44 PM |
| Photo cleaning disclosure | 71buc | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 6 | 12-18-2012 08:40 AM |
| B&L Auction Disclosure | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 77 | 05-21-2008 09:08 PM |
| disclosure issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 05-31-2007 06:45 PM |
Threaded Mode