![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
If everyone knows what you paid for it, it can be harder to get what you want for it. You need to realize that a house is not a card and that is a very bad analogy. A card can be 1 of 1. Very specific in a thin collector market. There may only be a dozen people on the planet that want the card. The card may only sell 5 times in a hundred year period(if that) depending on what it is. It may take a very long time to find that person. That ask price and that buy price are hugely important to the sellers ability to get the desired asking price in a market like that on 1 of 1s, errors, oddities, and obscure issues. Last edited by PhillipAbbott79; 04-09-2017 at 07:27 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I guess what I don't understand is how it upsets people so much, almost like this entitled attitude with the information. There have been tons of reasons why this practice is done and some members here seem to gloss over those. I do to not possibly piss off my buyer, I don't even ask I just do it...I am a guy, it's easier that way. No one really owes anyone else an explanation...which brings me back to my point mentioned above.
Just yesterday I reach out to a member looking for a specific card, he inquires, inquires more and wants a price. I write a nice 2 paragraph description to go along with the scans of the graded card and highlight recent auction activity and my price...crickets. I don't even get back a "no thank you" or even an "up yours"...email just goes deaf. The basic communication skills that lack in this hobby are astounding, treating someone with common courtesy seems to be becoming the exception and bravery behind a keyboard is always dramatic so removing a price, which isn't any of my business to begin with, seems like small potatoes. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+10000000000000000
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
99.9% of the purchases and sales we do, whether on eBay, REA, Heritage, LOTG are accessible on the Internet going forward. Don't understand why transactions done on BST have to be cloaked in secrecy. I'm not losing sleep over it, but don't understand the other side either.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"it's not my job to educate anybody!"
Lol
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time Last edited by ajjohnsonsoxfan; 04-09-2017 at 12:59 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I like tacos.
What I put in em and on em is my business. What I pay for em is nobody's business, especially the ex.
__________________
T206 156/518 second time around R312 49/50 1959 Topps 568/572 1958, 1961, 1963, 1964, 1957, 1956… ...whatever I want |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree that a completed sale price is really no one's business except for the buyer and seller, but as a newer collector of older cards, I love it when the asking price is left in the thread because I search the archives for past sales. That helps me set realistic starting prices when I want to sell my own stuff.
__________________
Looking for a T206 Jimmy Lavender Cycle back plus several American Beauty and Tolstoi backs for Providence players. Successful sales transactions with jamorton215, gorditadogg, myerburg311, TAFKADixie, jimq16415, Thromdog, CardPadre |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Oh! but next time I have another taco I want to sell... Please view and consider!!!!! I went off the rails with this, and its all in jest. 😁 |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Rethinking this question, I cannot think of a logical reason for removing the asking or sales price when I delete the scan and the text of the listing.
The last one I deleted was listed for $83 and sold for $83. ![]()
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number Last edited by frankbmd; 04-09-2017 at 05:21 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
T206 156/518 second time around R312 49/50 1959 Topps 568/572 1958, 1961, 1963, 1964, 1957, 1956… ...whatever I want |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Oh you're right, it's a very bad analogy ![]()
__________________
Successful transactions on Net54 with balltrash, greenmonster66; Peter_Spaeth; robw1959; Stetson_1883; boxcar18; Blackie |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just look at all the info out there now regarding sold prices on houses accessible to the public. Stopped lots of flippers in their tracks. Also, led to people changing addresses on their houses and condos. Unit 1 for unit A, 3rd street to Third St...etc
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes. The housing market works nothing like the card market but that is way off of the point I was attempting to make, along with your analogy.
My argument only, was that there is more potential room to make profit if buyers don't know what I paid for an item. It is also has the chance of turning some buyers off because they don't know what a fair price would be. You only want to know what 'fair' is so you don't get ripped off. You don't want to pay more than you have to, but you are forgetting that you don't have to pay anything if you don't want to. If you purchase with what you think it is worth to you, regardless of knowing what it is worth to someone else, you will never get ripped off. You then don't need to know what other people thought it was worth, because you got it for what you thought it was worth to you. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
yes confucius good post and pretty much useless for this conversation
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It actually is a bad analogy because house sales are public record. Not because they couldn't be considered 1 or 1 items as well (which they could).
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pet peeve of the day | Snapolit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-03-2016 12:20 PM |
A pet peeve | 1963Topps Set | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 05-07-2015 12:20 PM |
BST Pet Peeve | Minerscoin | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 08-05-2009 05:48 AM |
B/S/T pet peeve | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 05-17-2006 08:58 PM |
pet peeve | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 09-14-2003 04:26 PM |