![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It sounds like the point 52boyton is trying to make is that on cards where there is a huge price jump for 1 grade, say a clemente 7 at 25k vs an 8 at 125k you will never see a nice 7 out sell an 8.
I'd have to say I agree. On these types of cards the higher grade will always bring a higher price. I do remember an example that was discussed on net54 of a very nice 51 mantle 4 outselling a rough 5 in the same auction. Maybe a year ago or so. But that is another card where I don't thing you'll ever see a 7 outsell an 8, or an 8 outsell a 9.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
basically when the money matters to middle class person is when the flip becomes more important....one exception the 'artwork' cards where any month can be a 100k plus or minus like a psa 3 versus 4 rookie ruth or wagner...there more to the card, who used to own it and other factors besides the flip.... but for 99% of the cards where the money matters the flip matters... i not see a 2.5 topps rookie mantle sell for 40k but i bet you there have been some lame 4.5s that have.. will i pay 100 bucks more on a psa 3 even though 4's go for 70...sure who cares about 30 bucks if love the card....if its over 4k...then i not going to make that decision so easily.. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
On those specific cards, in 7 and above, I agree because the prices are so different. But that is not the case with 98% of the cards we see. I know as I am looking for many hours every single day at completed auctions and recent sales prices. Below the 7 and 8 level on those two cards you will see jockeying in values not respective of their flips. I can post numerous examples but it's common sense if you are watching what is going on. I routinely see '51 and '52 Micks in 2,3,4,5 and sometimes 6 grades that underperform their lower number counterparts which have better visual appeal. It only happens almost every single day.
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 06-14-2016 at 09:04 AM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
so for things that matter the flip matters on 99% of the deals..thats all i saying...always exceptions...but theres a reason why there is a Rule in the first place...then the exceptions.. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In my opinion many of these lower flips outperforming higher ones is because the buyers think they are going to get the card into a higher flip. Not because it's some collector who likes the card more.
Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-14-2016 at 09:28 AM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i agree with that.....and they are trying to bump it up because they sell the flip not the card..
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I think it would be more accurate if you said, at the high end of high dollar cards (7 and above) the flip matters more than the card. As we go down the totem pole in grade, the flip matters less. How about that? .
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I disagree. Try posting something on BST or your site with the flip covered up and see if anyone buys it without inquiring.
Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-14-2016 at 09:34 AM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
if this is true than I'd be more concerned there may be "relationships" between said "doctors" and graders at "PSA" presumably...especially in light of the supposed cracking down on giving high grades at psa.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Maybe. Then again, there are very good card doctors out there, and as I have said many times for your submission fee you aren't buying a crime lab, you are buying a quick review.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB - 1954 Topps Ernie Banks | Cubswin82 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 01-12-2015 07:11 PM |
FS 1954 Ernie Banks and Ted Williams VG | jjcollects | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-17-2013 12:35 PM |
WTB 1954 Topps Ernie Banks | Taxman | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-07-2013 08:17 AM |
FSH:1954 Topps Ernie Banks RC Psa 7 | Haybag | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 03-05-2013 04:43 AM |
WTB: 1954 Ernie Banks | SushiX37 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-28-2012 07:31 PM |