![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello everyone,
I’m a newbie to vintage. A couple of years back, I bought a ‘54 Aaron, but needed to move it for some cash later on. I’m in the market again to purchase this card, and maybe a few others. With all the trimming scandals that have come out recently, how can I avoid getting burned? It seems like even buying from someone reputable, they might not have known they owned a trimmed one. Is it safer to just buy SGC? I do really like their holders, but it seems like PSA holds their value better. I would love to hear some opinions of how I can acquire a few key cards for my collection, and feel like they are fully legit. Thank you! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Very long story short - yes, for the moment PSA enjoys higher resale value and a kind of oddly unaffected reputation in the market. The scandal has broken and the details are known, but the implications for all investors and collectors have not fully set in yet, and they may not ever. Folks who have safe deposit boxes full of high-end vintage cards have a lot of skin in the game, and at the end of the day have not really decided yet whether or not they are going to make PSA / CU pay the price they should over the scandal, either the complicitness or gross incompetence, and the like.
SGC is historically a more consistent grader of vintage cards, and their customer service and turn times are much better than PSA's. If you have serious concerns about investment potential and losing value, PSA is a safe bet in the short term. If you are a collector who wants accurately graded cards, I would do business with SGC all day long. PSA is probably going to be safer for low-grade vintage right now. An Aaron rookie that is an honest-looking PSA 3 has a lot lesser chance of being altered / tampered with than a stunning 8 with white borders and razor corners that looks too good to be true.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 09-17-2019 at 08:39 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The PSA sells for more makes no sense to me at all. Most seem to ignore that means you are paying more for it.
SGC is more consistent at grading and they are generally cheaper to buy. That means when you sell it you are still going to get the lower SGC price. The big plus is you can own a nice card a little cheaper in a WAY nicer looking slab. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If you go over on the prewar / main board, you will find a lot of consensus with the opinion that PSA still sells for more because big picture, the vast majority of collectors and investors of their product are either woefully ill-informed on the scandal, or (worse) know and simply do not care. Big wheel collectors of high-end vintage face a very bleak proposition if they truly care about cards not being altered, or the fact that their incredible PSA 8 T206 Whatever HOF'er that is worth 5 or 6 figures on the open market may suddenly be worth DRAMATICALLY less if they tell someone they care about that fact, and start a movement to trash PSA, their market value, and the value that their slabs currently bring to cards and collections. Mainly that said market value will drop quickly, and they will be left holding the bag.
Soooo....ummmm, why not just leave well enough alone? Yes, that card may be altered now that I read all this, but you know it looks really nice in that new slab, and it's in my safe deposit box anyway, and it would be really hard to prove for sure, er - wouldn't it? It becomes an ends justifying the means situation. Not enough people care or have any real desire to burst the bubble to come forward. So what, some waves are being made on some message boards where people really care about the hobby. This too, shall pass. I could be wrong, but I will be very surprised if in the next 6-18 months, people start coming forward en masse to demand that PSA make good on their grading guarantee for a bunch of high dollar cards in slabs with grades that they don't agree with. It's just stuff...right?
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 09-18-2019 at 07:24 AM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John,
Everything you said is 100% true and the bottom line. Well put Last edited by Johnny630; 09-17-2019 at 07:12 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Card doctoring debacle | Snapolit1 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 34 | 07-10-2019 11:36 AM |
T202 or T205 for a novice prewar collector? | vintagebaseballcardguy | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-26-2016 04:30 AM |
SGC's official response to '52 Mantle debacle | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 40 | 02-10-2008 06:43 AM |
Bushing's latest debacle | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 05-11-2005 04:48 PM |
Watch Out for Crooked Ebay Seller or the laments of a novice collector | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-23-2003 12:34 AM |