![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Collectors today are very lucky that they have modern conveniences to help their collections grow....Its Amazing what Burdick and other founding fathers were able to accomplish with snail mail and very little published information...
Today we have the Internet which connects us instantly to people around the world...we also have TPG's, registries and most importantly, Population Reports.. These modern tools need to be used to reevaluate what we have come to know as American Caramel Rarities.... Each individual collector will have his own subjective opinion of the difficulty of a card based on how quickly, or how cheaply a certain card was obtained... a collector may have been very lucky, and come across a very difficult card early in the collection process, and this card is then thought of as being "not that hard" when in fact, it may not have been seen for many more years... My Goal is to take subjectivity out of the E 90-1 set and come up with a more accurate depiction of a cards difficulty....Enter the Population Reports... Both PSA and SGC have extensive Pop reports that are nearing 20 years old... People may say they are inaccurate but a few crossovers or crack outs will not spoil the information within...Look at the Pop reports as "the most possible graded cards in existence." Yes, there may be less in actuality due to crack outs, but that inflates the population...so a very low pop card may actually have Less in circulation than stated, thereby supporting rarity levels... Our founding collecting Fathers have traditionally called these cards rare: Mike Mitchell Joe Jackson ..and these cards Very Difficult: Bill Sweeney Hans Lobert Dave Shean Larry McLean Hugh Duffy.... However, New evidence paints a different, Objective picture... Without further ado, I present the COMBINED POP REPORTS of PSA and SGC graded E90-1 American Caramels... Leach Throwing 25 Dougherty 25 Bescher 26 Stone Left hand 30 Lobert 31 Shean 32 Gibson back view 34 Siegle 34 Howell Wind up 35 McLean 35 Speaker 36 Wagner Throwing 36 Duffy 36 Stahl 36 ---------------------------- O'conner 38 Ritchie 38 Upp 38 Demmitt 38 Barry 38 Bliss 39 Leach Batting 39 Gray 39 Leever 39 Camnitz 39 Corridon 40 H Davis 41 Walsh 42 Young Clev 42 Sweeney 42 Keeler Red Port 42 Hartzell Batting 42 Karger 44 Mitchell 44 Bemis 44 Tenney 44 Pastorius 44 Sheckard 44 O'leary 44 McIntyre 44 Clement 44 Donovan 44 Stovall 45 Groom 45 Irwin 45 Bell 47 Clarke Pitt 48 McInnis 48 Gibson Front 48 I Thomas 48 R Thomas 49 Wiltse 49 Overall 49 Brandsfield noP 49 Lumley 50 Isbell 50 Phelps 50 Schlitzer 50 Blankenship 50 J Tannenhill 50 Butler 50 Keeler Throwing 50 Knight 51 Miller 51 Jordan 52 Donlin 52 Fromme 52 F Mitchell 54 Hall 54 Unglaub 54 G Davis 54 Ellis 55 Bush 56 Graham 57 Willis 57 L Tannenhill 58 Wagner Batting 62 Oakes 63 B Brown 64 Marquard 64 Joss Pitching 64 Schaefer 64 Krause 65 Bransfield P 67 Grant 67 Heitmuller 68 Bradley 68 M Brown 70 ----------------------- Engle 73 Dooin 77 Dygert 79 Hartzell Batting 80 Mullin 80 Stanage 84 J Sweeney 85 Mcquillan 85 Stone LH 87 Criger 88 Bailey 90 Summers 99 Howell Follow 106 --------------------high pop HOF's--------/ Bresnahan 89 Collins 91 Chance 94 Clarke Phila 101 Crawford 107 Chase 110 Joe Jackson 115 Keeler Pink 116 Tinker 120 Lajoie 122 Joss Portrait 127 Bender 129 Jennings 129 Mathewson 132 Wallace 133 Baker 135 Plank 139 Young Boston 149 Cobb 234 ---------------- There you have it! They key to me is Bailey, Summers and Howell....these commons have been graded almost 100 times each...you can't say that there are so many Bailey, Summers, or Howell collectors that they altered the pop reports...these pop reports are truly indicative of the amount of cards out there... There are really no outliers...an amazingly consistent pop report... Only a handful of cards stand out as real Toughies! So, say hello to the NEW MODERN RARITIES of the e90-1 set: Tommy Leach Throwing Dougherty Bob Bescher ( the only card Steve soloway was unable to obtain for his set) George Stone Left hand George Gibson Back View Johnny siegle (by far the lowest pop of any horizontal card In this set) Harry Howell Wind up Of special note are a few Rarities that are HOF's! Tris Speaker Wagner Throwing Hugh Duffy Enjoy! PS..the T206 Wagner has one of the smallest pop reports in its set, verifying its status as THE iconic rarity....notice there are over 100 Joe Jackson e90-1.. Last edited by ScottFandango; 07-17-2013 at 08:09 AM. Reason: Punctuation, fixed omission, keebler |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice research Scott...how would you rank/categorize the e90-1 miller w/sunset pose...which I've seen very few of...and which noone seems to recognize as a variation or scarcity within this set.
I know...I have a one track mind!!! Last edited by ullmandds; 07-16-2013 at 09:03 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would love to see a scan of the backs of those if possible!
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
i'll get you 1 tonight when I get home.
Last edited by ullmandds; 07-16-2013 at 09:49 AM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Any new variation talk is highly acceptable in this thread
![]() Is that a blank back or does it have American Caramel 100 subjects on back? My initial reaction was the sunset card iis a E101 without some blue shadowing... Would LOVE to see the back! Will wait patiently... |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
scott...it is definitely an e90-1...it has an e90-1 back...not blank. I have seen maybe 3 of them since I've been searching for miller glove pose...like approx 3-4 yrs.
Mine was acquired from a fellow board member who purchased a lot of mostly e90-1 raw at auction in the last 2 yrs or so...the lot contained 2 of these sunset millers and also contained some tougher e90-1 like keeler red portrait. This variation has been discussed in the past(see archive) but no one seemed to know/care much about it?! Last edited by ullmandds; 07-16-2013 at 09:59 AM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice compilation Scott...here are a few thoughts.
I do not think the Joe Jackson card has ever been considered rare. Extremely popular, yes, especially the last twenty years, and thus expensive. But not a difficult card compared to other E90-1's. Check out Lew Lipset's Encyclopedia...he does not include it in his lists of difficult to extremely rare cards. I also would like to make a point about the 'graded' rarity of most of the common players at the top of your lists (which is appreciated, by the way). It has only been in the past two or three years that the Leach-throwing, Dougherty, Bescher, Stone-left hand, and Howell-wind up have had more than a nominal added value in the SCD Guide. All of these cards were basically listed as commons in the 2009 guide. By 2011 their prices had been elevated (except for Stone-left hand). I always like to think of all the sets, near-sets and larger groupings of E90-1 auction lots over the years...quite often some of the 'better' cards of these raw collections (usually the big name hall of famers and the traditional 'rarities' of the set) were the ones that were sent out for grading. I think you have honed in on some of the scarcities of this set, but I also think some of the real low populations on some of the commons has been the result of these cards not being perceived as particularly rare until very recently. In other words, I think these are scarce cards, but more are likely out there ungraded to narrow the gap at the top of your scarcity charts. In another line of reasoning, I believe that your list really exposes the HOF rarities of the set, as these are cards most likely to have been graded over time. I knew about the difficulty of the Speaker card, as well as the Duffy, but the Wagner Throwing comes as a little bit of a surprise as to how scarce it is, as Wagner cards are about as likely to have been graded as any in the set. Once again, an interesting read. And by the way, my Miller fielding has no smog induced sunset. I think the sunset version should be noted in the guides and by the TPG's as a legitimate variation, especially since it is an 'added' color (not a missing color) variation from the commonly seen card. Brian Last edited by brianp-beme; 07-16-2013 at 09:38 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What is the pop. of the Keeler red portrait? I didn't see it listed in the OP of this thread... I am pretty sure it is quite a bit tougher to find than either of the other two Keelers.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes...red keeler is def toughest of the 3.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The Keeler Red portrait card is mistakenly identified as part of the Keebler cookie family (42 on the combined population list).
Brian |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't say wether it would apply to E90s, but in the closeup looking I've done with T206 population reports there's a rather clear 2:1 ratio for HOF cards being graded.
Also a bit early, but I think that may be much higher for rare cards or ones believed to be rare. Magie is in the same range as any p150 common. But we know it's not common. That may affect the number on the Mitchell. Steve B |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How do I view sent PM's? | SetBuilder | WaterCooler Talk- Off Topics | 2 | 12-14-2012 09:22 AM |
Blanks....a better view | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 09-08-2007 03:02 PM |
Can I view your personal collection? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 12-25-2006 09:19 AM |
Objective card grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 10-15-2004 09:05 AM |
To view this page with description, click here. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 11-19-2003 03:37 AM |