 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
05-25-2012, 09:05 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I've had cards that were deemed trimmed by one grading service (PSA or SGC) and not by another and in that case don't think any disclosures are necessary, but in this case, unless the card is sent to SGC for grading, I believe full disclosure should be provided.
With that said, for all the PSA/3rd party grading bashers out there (I'm not one of them), why would they care what PSA said about he card. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1965 & 66 Philadelphia Football Card Backs | CowboysGuide | Football Cards Forum | 1 | 01-07-2010 05:08 PM |
| Bad card sold by 4_sharp_corners | HBroll | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 12-18-2009 04:28 PM |
| Best HOF Rookie Card; worksheet | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-24-2008 02:34 AM |
| Graded Card Moral and Ethical Issue | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 53 | 09-25-2006 09:07 PM |
| Why can't an altered card be graded? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 10-17-2005 10:28 PM |
Threaded Mode