Any thoughts on this Splendid Splinter

[JollyElm]

Originally Posted by Bilko G

His doesn't interconnect like yours, they are just written over each other.

Huh?? What am I missing?

Screen Shot 2012-05-19 at 11.44.04 PM.jpg

[bender07]

Originally Posted by JollyElm

Huh?? What am I missing?

Attachment 64010

Yours aren't even close unfortunately.

[JollyElm]

Originally Posted by bender07

Yours aren't even close unfortunately.

He clearly said, "His doesn't interconnect like yours, they are just written over each other." Yet that is blatantly untrue. Does anybody tell the truth in these forums...ever???

[scmavl]

Darren,
I agree with what you're talking about, it is connected the same. That is not the way Ted normally signed though and as a few others have said, yours do not seem to be true Williams unfortunately.

[JollyElm]

Originally Posted by scmavl

Darren,
I agree with what you're talking about, it is connected the same. That is not the way Ted normally signed though and as a few others have said, yours do not seem to be true Williams unfortunately.

I can appreciate your thoughts on this, because you're giving reasons why you think my signature is not authentic. I'm all on board for that type of reason. But it bothers the living heck out of me when people just blatantly lie in their 'opinions.'

My motivation is obvious. I want the signatures to be real, because they are mine. But when people are lying to try to convince me otherwise? What's the motivation there?

[bender07]

Originally Posted by JollyElm

I can appreciate your thoughts on this, because you're giving reasons why you think my signature is not authentic. I'm all on board for that type of reason. But it bothers the living heck out of me when people just blatantly lie in their 'opinions.'

My motivation is obvious. I want the signatures to be real, because they are mine. But when people are lying to try to convince me otherwise? What's the motivation there?

I can certainly appreciate that you want your autographs to be real but they're simply not. They look nothing like any other examplar we've seen. Don't take it personally. A bunch of the signatures you've been posting the last few days are bogus/secretarial. Live and learn.

[chaddurbin]

Originally Posted by JollyElm

My motivation is obvious. I want the signatures to be real, because they are mine. But when people are lying to try to convince me otherwise? What's the motivation there?

trust me, no one is giving you false info so they can pry those sigs away from you...if that's what you're thinking.

[Splinte1941]

Originally Posted by chaddurbin

trust me, no one is giving you false info so they can pry those sigs away from you...if that's what you're thinking.

[Deertick]

Originally Posted by JollyElm

He clearly said, "His doesn't interconnect like yours, they are just written over each other." Yet that is blatantly untrue. Does anybody tell the truth in these forums...ever???

I don't claim to be an expert. But...."His doesn't interconnect like yours" is a TRUE statement. I don't believe he is saying one does and one does not interconnect. I believe he means the authentic signature interconnects at the TOP of the d and yours connect from the BOTTOM. I'm sure an apology is in order.....