Any thoughts on this Splendid Splinter

[scmavl]

Darren,
I agree with what you're talking about, it is connected the same. That is not the way Ted normally signed though and as a few others have said, yours do not seem to be true Williams unfortunately.

[JollyElm]

Originally Posted by scmavl

Darren,
I agree with what you're talking about, it is connected the same. That is not the way Ted normally signed though and as a few others have said, yours do not seem to be true Williams unfortunately.

I can appreciate your thoughts on this, because you're giving reasons why you think my signature is not authentic. I'm all on board for that type of reason. But it bothers the living heck out of me when people just blatantly lie in their 'opinions.'

My motivation is obvious. I want the signatures to be real, because they are mine. But when people are lying to try to convince me otherwise? What's the motivation there?

[bender07]

Originally Posted by JollyElm

I can appreciate your thoughts on this, because you're giving reasons why you think my signature is not authentic. I'm all on board for that type of reason. But it bothers the living heck out of me when people just blatantly lie in their 'opinions.'

My motivation is obvious. I want the signatures to be real, because they are mine. But when people are lying to try to convince me otherwise? What's the motivation there?

I can certainly appreciate that you want your autographs to be real but they're simply not. They look nothing like any other examplar we've seen. Don't take it personally. A bunch of the signatures you've been posting the last few days are bogus/secretarial. Live and learn.

[chaddurbin]

Originally Posted by JollyElm

My motivation is obvious. I want the signatures to be real, because they are mine. But when people are lying to try to convince me otherwise? What's the motivation there?

trust me, no one is giving you false info so they can pry those sigs away from you...if that's what you're thinking.

[Splinte1941]

Originally Posted by chaddurbin

trust me, no one is giving you false info so they can pry those sigs away from you...if that's what you're thinking.

[JollyElm]

It's funny how people keep chiming in and just ignoring what my posts were about--these people who give their 'opinions' on authenticity while blatantly lying about the facts. Interesting. That tells me all I need to know about your trustworthiness.

[Wymers Auction]

Originally Posted by JollyElm

It's funny how people keep chiming in and just ignoring what my posts were about--these people who give their 'opinions' on authenticity while blatantly lying about the facts. Interesting. That tells me all I need to know about your trustworthiness.

If you don't want to hear peoples' opinions then don't ask. They can chime in as they see fit. No one is lying to you.

[JollyElm]

Originally Posted by Wymers Auction

If you don't want to hear peoples' opinions then don't ask. They can chime in as they see fit. No one is lying to you.

And that, sir, is a lie. When the person said, "His doesn't interconnect like yours, they are just written over each other" that was a blatant lie. But then again, I guess you don't actually read any posts, you just chime in because you enjoy being a d_uchebag.

[Splinte1941]

Originally Posted by JollyElm

It's funny how people keep chiming in and just ignoring what my posts were about--these people who give their 'opinions' on authenticity while blatantly lying about the facts. Interesting. That tells me all I need to know about your trustworthiness.

With all due respect, what facts are you claiming people are lying about?