This looks interesting indeed

[danmckee]

WOW that is cool, how long did you work there? I don't remember ever meeting you. Dan

[ksabet]

Originally Posted by danmckee

WOW that is cool, how long did you work there? I don't remember ever meeting you. Dan

I detect a bit of sarcasm, but to answer your question it was around 2005-2007.

I am not debating the topic you brought up, just the fact that I believe these gentlemen to be stand up guys.

[danmckee]

No sarcasam whatsoever, I think that is neat that you worked for them and odd that I never met you since I am there several times a year.

Hey, they wouldn't hire me so you have one up on me.

Dan

[danmckee]

I forgot to mention that you are very welcome to debate what I have posted, I think I have posted strictly facts.

[ksabet]

Originally Posted by danmckee

No sarcasam whatsoever, I think that is neat that you worked for them and odd that I never met you since I am there several times a year.

Hey, they wouldn't hire me so you have one up on me.

Dan

They kept me in the basement most of the time. No seriously my desk was in the basement, kinda like Milton. I wrote for the catalog and traveled to shows with Bill.

Its really a matter of trust, so there is no debate. I trust that despite him bidding on items for his store, that no shill bidding takes place as they do not see max bids. Obviously we live in a society where trust comes at a premium especially in this hobby so there is no sense in me trying to convince you as you are not in a position to trust as I am.

[glchen]

I just wanted to say that I don't think Huggins and Scott is alone in doing this. Other auction houses have also been known to do this. I can't remember the thread, but I thought I remember that one of the auction houses gave the excuse that if the lot was going for a really good value, they would also look into purchasing the lot for themselves.

I think the auction house with the best integrity would again fall back to REA. No hidden reserves, no employee bidding, no employee owned lots (unless fully disclosed), etc. I think that they are still the gold standard.

[Matt]

Originally Posted by glchen

I just wanted to say that I don't think Huggins and Scott is alone in doing this. Other auction houses have also been known to do this.

I believe Hunt Auctions bids on items with a house account if they believe the sale price is below market.

[danmckee]

Originally Posted by Matt

I believe Hunt Auctions bids on items with a house account if they believe the sale price is below market.

Hi Matt, Hunt's always had a bidding house account at their live auctions. They were there live like I was and couldn't see who the phone bidders were. Not that it is any better and not that H&S can see who is bidding or ceilings left, but it does seem a bit strange for the need to do this. Just set higher minimums maybe?

Dan

[Bugsy]

Originally Posted by ksabet

I trust that despite him bidding on items for his store, that no shill bidding takes place as they do not see max bids.

It doesn't matter whether they know the max bids or not, it is still shilling. His participation in the bidding is raising the final prices and therefore increasing Huggins & Scotts' profits on those lots.

Consider this. If I were to bid on my own eBay listings, I don't know what the high bidder has entered, but my participation would still alter the final price.

It is a clear conflict of interest to participate in any bidding when you stand to financially benefit from the outcome of the sale. I don't see how anyone can argue otherwise.

[danmckee]

Originally Posted by ksabet

They kept me in the basement most of the time. .

This was funny, though I know what you mean as I know the set up there well. But still a funny statement if you don't really know the set up there.