Casey Anthony trial- Not guilty

[novakjr]

I know that you can't profit from a crime. And the big gripe is that Casey will potentially get rich out of all this. Does anyone else think the laws should be ammended to include not profiting from any crime in which you've been tried for, even if found not guilty, unless a true guilty party is actually found?

Also technically, she WAS found guilty of lying to investigators. That right there is a crime that should disallow her from profiting in any way pertaining to this case..

[tiger8mush]

http://news.yahoo.com/child-dies-cho...000233059.html

I think we need a new law banning electrical cords!!! Or something to give the parents some jail time!!

(i'm just poking the beehive here cuz i have nothing productive to add to the main board and the Bruces have been banned so there is a lull )

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by tiger8mush

http://news.yahoo.com/child-dies-cho...000233059.html

I think we need a new law banning electrical cords!!! Or something to give the parents some jail time!!

I don't know all the facts of this particular case, but there ARE NY state laws that would give parents jail time for maltreatment. Then again, I wouldn't expect anyone who dislikes laws intended to protect children to understand that.

[tiger8mush]

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

Then again, I wouldn't expect anyone who dislikes laws intended to protect children to understand that.

David, I'm not quite sure that just because a person doesn't agree with passing the proposed Caylee's Law means that they can painted with a broad stroke of disliking laws intended to protect children.

I'm fine with saying that a parent/caregiver should report their child's death in a timely manner, but nailing a specific timeframe on it or suffering consequences of being nailed with a felony and possibility of what, 20 years jailtime? for missing the deadline is just a little overboard. What if they miss the deadline by 2 minutes? If some lawyer wanted to, they could prosecute them and technically it'd hold up cuz hey, its the law!!!

Laws are often good-intentioned when they are created. But if they are too general, then they can be used for purposed other than created. For example, on a less lethal scale, on the main board Barry Sloate mentioned the law about regulating prices on rent for NYC apartments that was created after WW2 or whatever for returning soldiers, but is outdated and causes a lot of headache in the area in today's economy. Just an example is all.

Have a good day,
Rob

[vintagetoppsguy]

Rob,

You are entitled to your opinion. You’re also entitled to express your opinion. However, you can’t back your opinion with a reasonable argument. Other than your made up “What ifs…,” you haven’t given one VALID reason why you think this law is a bad idea. I thought we were going to agree to disagree, but since you wanted to drag it back up, you need to back up your opinion and do so without “What ifs…”

DJ

[GoldenAge50s]

Altho I haven' read this whole thread I just want to say I watched this trial from beginning to end & in my mind there was MORE than enough circumstantial evidence to convict her.

No doubt in MY mind she killed the kid--no doubt at all!

How does one explain that 10 or more people of all walks stated w/out question the trunk had the UNMISTAKABLE smell of a decomposing body? Not trash, not a dead animal---a decomposing human!

I also believe the judge is going to impose some sort of money recovery judgement in 60 days, so that should curtail her profiting to a large extent.

[barrysloate]

The jurors are now receiving death threats, and I heard that one of them had to quit her job and move to a new location. That's taking things a bit too far.