![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The auction does have some great cards, but the Wright is not one of them. An Old Judge with a badly faded photo is nothing to get excited about, regardless of the technical grade.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks like it's mis-cut at the bottom as well, or was that common for OJ's? Shouldn't that affect the grade?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Having an angular cut is not particularily unusual. The card's problem is the photo, not the cut. For photo clarity, the most important factor when judging Old Judge cards, it is a 2, not an 8.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The peck and snyder is interesting. There are two distinct types for the Cinci card. While both are typically dated 1869 is the general consensus that the type offered in the auction was issued earlier than the other type?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jay, sure looks like they graded on centering and corners, did not even look at clarity of photo.
Joe
__________________
![]() Collecting Detroit 19th Century N172, N173, N175. N172 Detroit. Getzein, McGlone, Rooks, Wheelock, Gillligan, Kid Baldwin Error, Lady Baldwin, Conway, Deacon White Positive transactions with Joe G, Jay Miller, CTANK80, BIGFISH, MGHPRO, k. DIXON, LEON, INSIDETHEWRAPPER, GOCUBSGO32, Steve Suckow, RAINIER2004, Ben Yourg, GNAZ01, yanksrnice09, cmiz5290, Kris Sweckard (Kris19),Angyal, Chuck Tapia,Belfast1933,bcbgcbrcb,fusorcruiser, tsp06, cobbcobb13 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's the problem with grading OJ's the TPG's don't seem to take clarity/fading into account at all when it is the single most important aspect of the card.
__________________
Looking for Nebraska Indians memorabilia, photos and postcards |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
no worries. In a few years, TPGs will change their grading criteria so they can get a bunch of new submittals. Of course though, any card submitted can't be demoted in grade, only raised, so the submitter has nothing to lose! well, except the cost of grading ![]() ![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have never heard that but I have never heard of a lot of things. I am privy to several different backs on the small ones. The large ones I think I have only seen 2 different colors but not backs.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am not certain when the type offered by Goodwin is dated. However, for the other type -- the full P&S trade card, the issue date varied from 1869 to 1870. The first version, black with the baseball ad on the verso, most likely was the first issue, released during the 1869 season. The second version, black with the ice skate ad, most likely was issued during the winter of 1869-70. And the third and final version, red with the baseball ad, most likely came out during the 1870 season (the team composition did not change in 1870). 1870 was the year P&S also issued the Athletics, Mutuals and White Stockings trade cards. Of these three, two (Athletics and Mutuals) were issued with colored inks -- blue for the Athletics and green for the Mutuals. Thus it is logical that the 1870 reissue for the Red Stockings would be in a red ink. Supporting this view that the red version was issued in 1870 is that the photo contrast on the red ones is noticably inferior than on the blacks. Constant use of a negative to make prints would over time degrade the negative, thus reducing the quality of the resultant print. Thus it makes sense the red versions would have weaker photo contrast than the earlier black issues. Be careful in evaluating claims by auction houses that sell red ones that the photo contrast is so outstanding. Over the past 25 years I have seen exactly one red version which had photo contrast matching the best blacks. That was over twenty years ago and unfortunately that red one was trimmed.
Last edited by benjulmag; 03-24-2011 at 04:59 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I love that Plank card. Is it just me or does it seem like the frequency of the Plank offerings are even less than the Wagner's. Anyone want to guess what that card goes for? I say $129,000.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Does anyone else disagree with this being Fred Clarke? Sure doesn't look anything like him to me. If this isn't Clarke has anyone seen a Fred Clarke Hermes Pin?
http://www.goodwinandco.com/LotDetai...in-Fred-Clarke Clint Hromek
__________________
Buying Kansas CDVs, Cabinets, RPPCs and other pre 1930 memorabilia. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
As for final hammer, I think you are in the ballpark. Could be a little more. I doubt it will go for much less than that. JimB |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone receive their auction winnings yet? (SCP & Goodwin) | JP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 02-23-2010 02:30 AM |
Goodwin Auction | Yankeefan51 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 02-14-2010 02:34 PM |
Huggins and Scott Auction Now Open | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-17-2008 10:24 AM |
Huggins and Scott Auction Now Open | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-07-2007 09:21 PM |
Question concerning lot 950 in the Goodwin & Co. auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-24-2006 05:12 PM |