 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14
08-23-2010, 06:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
A seller accepting a return is fine, and probably good practice. NOT because there's an implied warranty of slabability, but just fair business practice.
If the listing guaranteed the card would grade, then yes, definitely. If the seller had tried to grade it and was unsuccessful, that should be disclosed. Still, if the buyer wanted a graded card then he should have bought a graded card, instead of one that wasn't graded. No way would I, as a seller, reimburse a buyer his lost grading fees in such a situation, absent a guarantee that the card would grade. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question about eBay-posted 1928 Babe Ruth candy card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 02-17-2009 05:34 PM |
| Sam Mertes card question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 11-10-2008 01:36 PM |
| Question about 1925 Cuban card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-21-2006 07:36 PM |
| Card type question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-19-2005 11:30 AM |
| Restoration question - Card vs. books/etc... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-01-2005 07:37 PM |
Threaded Mode