 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
09-15-2009, 02:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
T205 Cycle Mathewson - Not a variation by SGC standards
Based on a request to SGC on why the Cycle Mathewson wasn't listed on the Master Registry Set, this was their reply:
Hi Frank, "We have not added it to the Master Set because all Cycle back Mathewsons come this way so it is more of an uncorrected error rather than a variation, but I will revisit that decision a little more in depth and get back to you if anything changes." Thank you, Brian So based on that response from SGC, if all PB Whites are that way, then it would fall into that same category of the Mathewson (though not necessarily an uncorrected error). My way of thinking is if it is different than the majority of cards, then it should be classified as a variation and listed accordingly in the registry. Just my 2 cents. r/ Frank 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NEWLY Discovered Uncataloged D351 Grennan Bakery Card #3 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 44 | 11-05-2023 07:46 PM |
| NEWLY Discovered Tobacco Card FInd Brunswick Maryland | danmckee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 05-14-2009 02:45 PM |
| T205 Possible back variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-27-2008 09:06 AM |
| New T205 Variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 11-11-2003 12:36 PM |
| T205 Rowan Color Variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 02-22-2002 03:20 PM |
Threaded Mode