![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can you give me your address I googled Aquarian Sports Cards and get only Net54 posts and other strange things...also can you supply a API feed?
Thanks |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jumping into the comps discussion… I find that people sometimes forget that comps change (higher or lower) over time. “You’re charging over comp…”
Sometimes true - if not true, comp prices would never go up. As others have said - comps are a good guard rail but they are not absolute (even though they may seem so to some) (I’ll also add that I find VCP to incredibly valuable both as a seller and collector - keep up the great work)
__________________
************************************************** *********** Jeff "Belfast1933" - honoring my dad, Belfast Maine and Right Fielder for the mighty East Side Rinky Dinks https://grossvintagebaseball.com/ |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I mean you could be analyzing NASA data from deep space quasars and there are going to be limitations on the data. That's not a reason to say the data is not useful. Data sets have limitations. You take note of the limitations and use the data with the limitations in mind.
There are plenty of ways of analyzing some of the data on past sales. VCP is the best source that pulls the most info together in one place. And it's very easy to use. Last edited by Snapolit1; 05-06-2025 at 10:34 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
physicist? |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
ah i was close! bet he's a cool guy -- great job to have. outer space and data sets... thats some good stuff
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
its like any other market. the more actionable data you have the better decisions you can make, but you also have to be prepared for seismic market shifts based on changes in real time behaviors/circumstances/environmental factors, et al. its actually quite interesting how well this thread intersects with the other one posted by peter about bid inflation. it directly relates to and exemplifies one aspect of how comps can be inflated and/or deflated by even small scale (or large) market actions by 'good' and 'bad' actors alike. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Comps are stupid and unrealistic. These are collectibles and there is no dedicated material cost or exact number. What someone bought and sold a card for yesterday is irrelevant to what I may buy and sell my card for.
Last edited by Vintagedeputy; 05-08-2025 at 11:20 AM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
real estate is a strong comparison for what market comps for cards function as. like jeff said, they're guardrails/guide rails. you as an individual can subjectively make the decision to 'list' your card at much higher than the going rate for similar condition sets/houses, or you can make the decision to 'buy' your card at a much lower than the going rate for similar condition sets/houses. either way, that subjective decision may leave your card on the market for weeks, months, or years; may leave you on the market for a card for weeks, months, or years. that's why successful brokers and agencies use comps to help buyers and sellers advocate and achieve success on the market for properties at all scales. nothing exists in a vacuum; markets of all sizes elucidate this same fundamental truth. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What do you mean by the part I bolded in your comment?
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There should have been a “no” in there. I fixed it.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I’ve always been curious about how Beckett came up with card prices back in the '90s. It seemed like a bit of a chicken-and-egg situation, dealers were using Beckett to set their prices, but Beckett claimed to base their prices on what dealers were charging. So where did the original pricing data actually come from?
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
So were price guides also stupid and unrealistic when they used to aggregate the comp data for us back in the 1990’s and earlier? Clearly no buyer or seller can be forced into paying a specific price, and at times other factors / reasoning surely comes into play - but if you don’t use market data to evaluate recent prices, then I’m imagining those who might find your pricing decisions out of line whether buying or selling stands to be a higher number. VCP is certainly useful; to the OP’s notion that it has no utility at all one would have to generally agree that the prices being paid elsewhere not tracked on VCP (whether that’s Facebook, WhatNot, a discord, the local card shop / show / flea market, garage sale…) are vastly out of line with those reported in VCP. I am only one person with a small postwar vintage collection - but at least in my experience - that’s neither true or close to being true. Some dealers will balk at the fact that a VCP average price represents a longer duration of time than just the last 3 comps that they want to use on their items because they were higher and it’s trending upward. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 05-06-2025 at 01:35 PM. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great discussion, and I am learning from the posts. I retract my use of the word "worthless." That was too strong of a word and I don't truly believe that to be the case, mainly based on some of the posts on this thread.
My original point was intended to be that people treat it like the be-all end-all, when it can't track most sales. I have had sellers send me screenshots that included prices from 3-4 years ago, or even pandemic pricing. I do agree that the other sales are likely influenced by VCP, or more so, eBay sales, which people who have never heard of VCP use. That is a great point, and much like the price guides of the early days. Some dealers still use Beckett. Many old-timers at the shows I frequent have Beckett prices listed on their cards, and then they will deal from there. I love to research; it's fun. If I have cards I want to buy, I will watch and track them on every possible platform for months. I keep meticulous records of the sales, even asking people what they bought things for and what they sold things for. I have great relationships with dozens of dealers and collectors, so I can do that. I am not so presumptuous as to say that everyone should cancel their subscriptions or anything. I said in the OP that I was willing to be wrong and learn. However, I still believe the vast majority of sales are not and will not ever be reported to them. Thus, a card is still only as valuable as the seller thinks it is and as the buyer's desire to have it. Quote:
__________________
[FONT="Lucida Sans Unicode"]CampyFan39 Last edited by campyfan39; 05-06-2025 at 02:28 PM. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
great observation chris. incomplete data is what keeps us data analysts (ie myself) ![]() you are 100% correct. incomplete information regarding sales and the failure to capture all data, all information, incomplete data sets, etc to me fundamentally characterizes the human condition. we have to do the best with what we have; hopefully develop relationships and mutual contextual understanding to build trust with one another and open ourselves up to and respect when people are able to see things that we can't or don't see ourselves. this is the big issue with markets in my opinion. they operate best in mutual good faith. if the seller wants me to succeed and i want the seller to succeed, we are in prime position to mutually benefit from the transaction. but because of things like obscured market information or data, as well as people who wish to exploit others for their perceived own personal gain, we have a lot of difficulty discerning truth or creating environments of mutual benefit. if sales are not reported or captured and introduced into data sets, we are working with the best we have. and as we so often see in humanity throughout history, the best we have is often a fair distance from the objective reality or the truth... |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I think the term "comps" has a bad reputation. If you walk around a card show and decide to buy a card from the dealer who offers the best price on that card, you've used "comps". If you have bought 10 T206 commons all in a similar condition over the past month for between $70-80 and you decline to buy another similar T206 today for $120 because you feel it's too much, you're using "comps". If what you bought a card for influences what you try to sell that card for, you're using a "comp". |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
VCP is a tool. It is one of many tools to use at your disposal if you choose to and is not worthless. When valuing and evaluating what price to pay for cards you must use many different tools and factors not just one. Comps and previous prices for same/similar grade are a useful guide but nothing is set in stone until buyer and seller agree on final price.
__________________
Tony Collecting: 1909-1911 T206 Southern Leaguers 1914 Cracker Jack Set (94 out of 145) |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The utility of any tool depends on the purpose of the user.
Objectively rare cards do not transact enough for comps on them to be meaningful. I recently offered a card for sale that had not sold anywhere in any format in several years. Mainstream postwar cards are common enough that comps are a reference point but eye appeal is more important. A fugly 7 is not worth as much as a blazing 6. Modern cards are so commoditized that comps are ubiquitous because there are a ton of them and they all basically look the same.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Value of a specific collectible is determined by a buyer and seller at that moment. If I buy a 52 Topps Mantle at a garage sale for 50 cents, the value of that exact card is 50 cents because that’s what I paid in cash for it. If I sell that same card for 1 million dollars, then the value of that specific card is now 1 million dollars because someone paid me that amount in cash. Last edited by Vintagedeputy; 05-08-2025 at 01:28 PM. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
throwing ethics out the window, you of course are 'allowed' to operate this way as an individual (because our legal system doesn't punish economic exploitation as long as it conforms to a few very basic marketplace regulations) but this isn't how market dynamics work. in accordance with that, you waive your right to be disappointed when your expectations fail to conform with reality in most cases -- which means a failure to get what you want, whether its money for your card, or a card for your money. this logic model collapses quickly and consistently in a collective marketplace where you are forced to contend with real world factors such as objectively constituted, framed and reframed market valuation as a shifting valuation at a global level over time. it has nothing to do with what you think anything is worth. you are a node in that global market; your behavior is either an outlier (which is buying a mantle for 50 cents, or selling it for 500m$ -- both of which would be taking advantage of someone else's market ignorance), or you conform to the market at large by offering fair going rates and standards for your products and services: again, in conformity to the global market. markets determine value as an ecosystem; market valuation is a reality. just because you are able to buy, lets say, a 30k card for 5 cents at a garage sale from an unaware seller -- or sell it for 1m to an unaware buyer, this is a predatory approach -- created on a case by case basis by a buyer or seller who is dictating terms in a pseudo-vacuum to an unaware buyer or seller. i don't think it needs much explaining why it is predatory to buy a '52 mantle from an elderly woman for 50 cents at a garage sale then turn around and sell it for whatever amount. you are, in both circumstances, willfully taking advantage of unaware buyers and sellers under the guise of 'the card is worth what its worth to me'. this is why being educated in economics is important in the current climate, because good faith isn't enough. this is why i advise that buyers and sellers of any good or service become educated in the going rates in their respective industries to avoid being taken advantage of. unfortunately, this kind of behavior is and can be quite common. ^^ this post is not meant to be offensive, but to speak directly from a deep economical foundation. i hope none is taken; cheers! Last edited by dbussell12; 05-08-2025 at 03:01 PM. Reason: more info |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That's a basic explanation which obviously doesn't work well for rare cards - but for cards like a 1952 Mantle, the market is what determines the price of a card - the general trend of sales, not a single sale.
__________________
I blog at https://universalbaseballhistory.blogspot.com |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is how I feel.
When I started this thread, I never imagined a VCP rep or owner (IDK)would be on here. Net 54 is awesome! This board is great, but my original point still stands, especially for raw cards. They cannot track most sales that occur. I only collect pure (raw) and have cracked out hundreds. I cracked out a 1952 Mathews two days ago for my permanent collection. That skews all of their data IMO, especially if I ever sell it. Quote:
__________________
[FONT="Lucida Sans Unicode"]CampyFan39 |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's The Collector Connection. We talked a few years back. No problem supplying the API
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bobby hopefully you can add...Would love to see VCP keep adding more AH's until you have all of them.
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
love to see this kind of collaboration here... clean data drives smart decisions; the more visibility and insight we have as a community and hobby the better it ultimately is for all of us
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've become a big fan of VCP. As others have said, it's a useful tool as an input to buying and selling decisions. It's great to compare past sales. It still needs people to use their judgment.
For example, if i compare 2 sales forna card and one swas a really old slab and another was just graded, I can make an adjustment accordingly. Having that info is great. Where I've found it surprisingly useful is assessing scarce pre war cards. I've found some cards where there was something like 2 sales and the last one was 2011. That helps me understand how rare a card might be and that there really isn't a comp. So the seller can name their price. Bobby, a couple of feature requests: 1. Search by serial number. It would.be good to see how often a specific slab has been sold and at what price 2. Raw cards I understand why you don't have these (eg the lack of standardization and people are inconsistent in their specification of condition), but it would be an incredible feature to be able to compare the price of a raw card vs it's graded equivalent. Perhaps you could rely on just a handful of raw providers (e.g. gregmorris cards) in the same way that you do with grading companies. G@ry G01db3rg
__________________
Working on the following sets: 1916 and 1917 Zeenut, 1954B, 1955B, 1971T and 1972T |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Raw data is something we are in the process of doing using our ML tech..something that would just by automated with no pricing averages just a place to see sales and you do your own analytics.. We are close to finishing off a major back end upgrade.... And we are also very close to having an affiliate program. If any of you are interested in promoting VCP and making some money let me know. You can do it online, FB groups, Trade shows, Podcasts, Brick and Mortar, etc.. We will send flyers with your unique sign up code. And you will have a portal to check as well. We will support and help you promote so if you need Banners to hang, etc... |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I’d love to see how people priced cards if they had no points of reference to do so.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA: from Experts who thwart "wack jobs" to unappreciated, human-based opinion givers | WhenItWasAHobby | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 08-18-2019 07:46 PM |
1960 Topps Mantle Signed "Rivals" Authenticity Opinion | canjond | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 3 | 06-28-2016 05:09 AM |
Harry "P-Nuts" Lowrey Opinion, and a couple of questions | egri | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 2 | 03-07-2016 05:45 PM |
1969-topps complete set, high grade,,"""SOLD"""" | mightyq | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-10-2014 01:28 PM |
How reliable is the PSA/DNA "Quick Opinion" service on eBay? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 03-18-2005 10:41 AM |