1952 Topps set question?

[swarmee]

Ah, I like both for investment/collecting purposes. For the 50s/60s cards, you're pretty much locked into the ones signed already, since many of the HOFs from those decades have now passed or stopped signing.

I actually just sold a 1933 Goudey Bill Dickey signed card this morning. It was in rough shape, but because it was autographed was valuable. I'd prefer to focus more on the fan favorite types than the standard HOFs that don't make you imagine how good they were. Guys like Bob Gibson, Nolan Ryan, Carlton Fisk, ones that you still see in the highlight clips.

[homerunhitter]

Originally Posted by swarmee

Ah, I like both for investment/collecting purposes. For the 50s/60s cards, you're pretty much locked into the ones signed already, since many of the HOFs from those decades have now passed or stopped signing.

I actually just sold a 1933 Goudey Bill Dickey signed card this morning. It was in rough shape, but because it was autographed was valuable. I'd prefer to focus more on the fan favorite types than the standard HOFs that don't make you imagine how good they were. Guys like Bob Gibson, Nolan Ryan, Carlton Fisk, ones that you still see in the highlight clips.

Thanks John for your insight on this. I also love signed HOF rookie cards however they get really, really expensive when you get down to the 50’s and 60’s players. Not sure I will ever afford/own a Hank Aaron signed rookie card or a Willie Mays signed 52 rookie, then I think why even bother if I’ll never truly collect them all (due to cost).

Im glad that I started this thread and that you gave your thoughts on this because prior to this thread I thought 100% that “any” 1952 topps would be a great investment due to it being such an old and iconic set! Now I am seeing that the 1952 topps set might not be so “automatic” when it comes to long term value.

[homerunhitter]

I think another thing that might mess with my OCD is if I started to collect these, is if PSA changes it’s slabs again! For me, I’ll have to have all the slabs matching plus I really don’t like the look of the the older PSA slabs. It would suck, if I collected these and PSA changed their Slabs halfway through!

[Republicaninmass]

Originally Posted by homerunhitter

I think another thing that might mess with my OCD is if I started to collect these, is if PSA changes it’s slabs again! For me, I’ll have to have all the slabs matching plus I really don’t like the look of the the older PSA slabs. It would suck, if I collected these and PSA changed their Slabs halfway through!

They do it for THIS reason!

One constant...is change!

Dont forget, slabs over the years dont all stack together perfectly!

[swarmee]

Originally Posted by homerunhitter

I think another thing that might mess with my OCD is if I started to collect these, is if PSA changes it’s slabs again! For me, I’ll have to have all the slabs matching plus I really don’t like the look of the the older PSA slabs. It would suck, if I collected these and PSA changed their Slabs halfway through!

This reminds me of the guy on the PSA boards who has been amassing cases of vintage 1980s unopened to crack them to submit to PSA for 10s.
https://forums.collectors.com/discus...ss-psa-10-sets

He started the thread and ripping back in 2018 when bulk grading was $6 each. He wanted to wait to submit the vast majority when he had complete sets, and then COVID boom happened, and submission prices went up to $20 minimum at one point. So the odds of him ever submitting all these perfect 10s he's been stockpiling is almost zero.

So don't let little things like slab/flip differences matter when it comes to your collecting. Take advantage of the opportunities you're given, when they're offered to you.