![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I’m a bit perplexed. This has to be the best 34 butterfinger I have ever seen. A touch of wavy paper but no folds or creasing. The lower right corner I though made this card a 3. Can anybody explain the 1 grade. No tape or paper loss on the back? Totally clean.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had trouble with the photo
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Pic?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't think the photo attached properly, because there's nothing here. I will say this though, I have heard from an overwhelming amount of people that PSA, from different card groups on FB that PSA has gotten a hell of a lot stricter with their vintage grading. I can also say that there are many collectors out there who "buy the card, not the grade" And if it's as nice as you describe, I'm sure that will be the case, should you turn around and sell it.
__________________
Successful Deals With: charlietheexterminator, todeen, tonyo, Santo10fan Bocabirdman (5x), 8thEastVB, JCMTiger, Rjackson44 Republicaninmass, 73toppsmann, quinnsryche (2x), Donscards. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would guess the grader was rebuffed by his wife the night before and came to work angry.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
That's why I've been pissed off for the past 3 years ! ![]()
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Perhaps he is being rebuffed every night.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd say it's because of the "wavy paper". Probably got wet at some point and dried out like that.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
__________________
Barry Larkin, Joey Votto, Tris Speaker, 1930-45 Cincinnati Reds, T206 Cincinnati Successful deals with: Banksfan14, Brianp-beme, Bumpus Jones, Dacubfan (x5), Dstrawberryfan39, Ed_Hutchinson, Fballguy, fusorcruiser (x2), GoCalBears, Gorditadog, Luke, MikeKam, Moosedog, Nineunder71, Powdered H20, PSU, Ronniehatesjazz, Roarfrom34, Sebie43, Seven, and Wondo |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by BobC; 12-20-2021 at 09:47 PM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Any paper loss on the back?
__________________
Thanks for your thoughts, Joe. Love the late 1800’s Boston Beaneaters and the early Boston Red Sox (1903-1918)! Also collecting any and all basketball memorabilia. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No paper loss on the back.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
R310s are among the most fragile "cards" I have ever handled, and are noticeably thinner and more susceptible to damage than the m101-s and 2s. I gave up collecting them for this reason. I scan them and basically put them away because any handling is risky, even in a rigid or semi-rigid sheet/holder.
Maybe there is the tiniest of edge tears, which would serve to knock down the grade. By tiny I mean 1/64" or smaller. The paper is so fragile it really doesn't "ding" when it makes contact with something-- it tends to tear, at least in my experience. Here is my Al Simmons. After I scanned it, I VERY carefully slid it into a sheet which was then slid into a rigid. As you know, even holding it between thumb and forefinger or however trying to get into a sleeve risks a spider crease, bend or wrinkle. Anyway, the R310 somehow touched the sleeve less than precisely going in and left the tiniest of tears on the bottom--smaller than the size of the dash on your keyboard. I refused to take it out and re-scan for fear it could only get worse if I dared to try the process again. Anyway, that flaw would probably lead to a "1", so maybe you have something similar--your pic is too small to see. My only other guesses would be possible erasure of light pencil or maybe a repaired pinhole. The "waviness" would not lead to a 1, IMO. ![]()
__________________
Now watch what you say, or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal Won't you sign up your name? We'd like to feel you're acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President. Last edited by nolemmings; 12-20-2021 at 10:37 PM. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I’d still happily take it!
__________________
https://www.youtube.com/user/JStottlemire1 I just love collecting, trading and enjoying the hobby. I PC and enjoy pre war iconic cards. I enjoy anything Cobb, Jackson, Ruth and Robinson. Currently working and prioritizing Jackie Robinson Bond Bread set. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Buffed would be better but not fluffed LOL
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A little larger picture of the OPs card.,..,
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As someone else mentioned, if it's wavy it may have water damage.
__________________
~20 SUCCESSFUL BST (1 trade) on Net54 |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm far from an expert on the set, but in general - the days of PSA or SGC or whomever grading on "the whole of the card" / appearance are long over for the most part with vintage, at least in my opinion. Now they seem to be taking the "one little thing that kills it" approach.
__________________
T206 Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Crack it out, soak it in water, dry it flat and send it back. Probably comes back as a 3 lol. Plus you'll get the added benefit of free marketing from the BODA crowd on Blowhard. It'll be fun watching them debate which edge you "trimmed" in order to get it to bump.
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The waviness is why.
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
still a nice looking card and would look great in any collection. IMO
__________________
Thanks all Jeff Kuhr https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/ Looking for 1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards 1920s Advertising Card Babe Ruth/Carl Mays All Stars Throwing Pose 1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth 1921 Frederick Foto Ruth Rare early Ruth Cards and Postcards Rare early Joe Jackson Cards and Postcards 1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson 1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson 1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They judge these larger size paper/thin issues RIDICULOUSLY harshly!! I can assure you both of the attached issues have no rippling, etc and I pegged them for grades between 5 and 7 (submitted a long time ago - so this is not just the recent harshness) - been shaking my head ever since!
__________________
I have been a Net 54 member since 2009 and have an Ebay store since 1998 https://www.ebay.com/usr/favorite_things Cards for sale: https://www.flickr.com/photos/185900663@N07/albums I am actively buying and selling vintage sports cards graded and raw. Feedback as a buyer: https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=297262 I am accepting select private consignments of quality vintage cards (raw or graded) and collecting "want" lists for higher end ($1K+) vintage cards. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That would likely destroy it, no?
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (135/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (195/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
__________________
Barry Larkin, Joey Votto, Tris Speaker, 1930-45 Cincinnati Reds, T206 Cincinnati Successful deals with: Banksfan14, Brianp-beme, Bumpus Jones, Dacubfan (x5), Dstrawberryfan39, Ed_Hutchinson, Fballguy, fusorcruiser (x2), GoCalBears, Gorditadog, Luke, MikeKam, Moosedog, Nineunder71, Powdered H20, PSU, Ronniehatesjazz, Roarfrom34, Sebie43, Seven, and Wondo |
![]() |
|
|