![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would guess the grader was rebuffed by his wife the night before and came to work angry.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
That's why I've been pissed off for the past 3 years ! ![]()
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Perhaps he is being rebuffed every night.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Buffed would be better but not fluffed LOL
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A little larger picture of the OPs card.,..,
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As someone else mentioned, if it's wavy it may have water damage.
__________________
~20 SUCCESSFUL BST (1 trade) on Net54 |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm far from an expert on the set, but in general - the days of PSA or SGC or whomever grading on "the whole of the card" / appearance are long over for the most part with vintage, at least in my opinion. Now they seem to be taking the "one little thing that kills it" approach.
__________________
Prewar Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd say it's because of the "wavy paper". Probably got wet at some point and dried out like that.
|
![]() |
|
|