![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Was surprised by how many degrees of difference exist on the Stewart. My only football sets are 61 Fleer and 1960 St Louis Cardinals Mayrose Meats, so I am safe from the Cogdill 😜
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks to Cliff Bowman for pointing this card out to me. As far as I know all the 59 Walls cards have the yellow border defect on the right bottom of the card. This one Cliff pointed out has the straightest border with the least yellow I have seen.
Ironically, in hand you can not see the tinge of yellow even with a magnifying glass ![]() Last edited by ALR-bishop; 10-16-2021 at 03:27 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Going through a stack of 67’s Topps looking for any opc’s and I found something odd. Double printed 392 Harper……is this a known error?
Last edited by Elberson; 10-19-2021 at 04:40 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Whole back…..
Last edited by Elberson; 10-19-2021 at 04:24 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's one of those things that can happen on any card; something run through twice. I tend to treat these like blank backs, something cool and a nice complement to a master set but probably exists somewhere on every card with a large production run like a Topps base set.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am not seeing any copies with just one copy right line....while this mis-print may vary form other cards in the set, it appears all copies of this card have both lines and is not a variation.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think they all have the double stamp. Just the one of the 4 I have has the bottom double stamped
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I know this is post 1980, but I would really like you guys' opinion on this card. For my Cardinals team sets I only include reoccurring variations.
I can assure you that multiples exist of this because I own 2 of them. However, I can't find another example anywhere. I am wondering how common this is and whether or not to include it in my team sets. This 1981 Topps Leon Durham has a black smear near the bill of the cap on the nameplate. Like I said, I own 2 of these that are identical but can't find another one anywhere else. ![]() Last edited by frankhardy; 10-20-2021 at 05:12 PM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scarce recurring print flaw ?
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 06:05 PM |
Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-03-2010 07:58 PM |
Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 07:23 PM |