 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
11-12-2021, 01:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks to Tom and Larry for pointing these out to me in posts above
|
|
#2
11-12-2021, 05:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
11-12-2021, 06:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Given the length of this thread my guess is this one may be in here somewhere, but I just found this "bearded Bailey" while looking through a large group of '75's. Based on an Ebay search, it seems to reoccur fairly regularly.
__________________
Successful transactions with: Chesboro41, jimivintage, Bocabirdman, marcdelpercio, Jollyelm, Smanzari, asoriano, pclpads, joem36, nolemmings, t206blogcom, Northviewcats, Xplainer, Kickstand19, GrayGhost, btcarfango, Brian Van Horn, USMC09, G36, scotgreb, tere1071, kurri17, wrm, David James, tjenkins, SteveWhite, OhioCard Collector, sysks22, ejstel. Marty
|
|
#4
11-13-2021, 11:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
1952 #28 Jerry Priddy
I have an article I did comparing black backs vs. red backs in this set with scans. This one appears to have been cropped. It is the only one that seems to have this issue. The sky in the top one (black back) looks thicker than on the lower red back version. You can see the item at the very top left mostly NOT there in the lower version. I also see that the small gap at the upper left is wider in the red back version. The dark color on the lower left is thicker in the red back version.
Why was this cropped and none of the others? Last edited by Sliphorn; 11-16-2021 at 09:15 AM.
|
|
#5
11-13-2021, 12:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tom— see post # 250 on page 4 of the Topps 1952 Gallery Thread for some other oddities for this card
Cliff--Willy is likely worth more than Bob Last edited by ALR-bishop; 11-13-2021 at 02:11 PM.
|
|
#6
11-17-2021, 03:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here is a print variation I had not seen before....
of course Lauraslazy has though ! https://www.ebay.com/itm/31366368159...hNds8&LH_BIN=1
|
|
#7
11-17-2021, 05:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do you know that seller Larry. He/she sure comes up with a lot of variants. Do they do it themselves or are they a clearinghouse ? They do negotiate and are dependable
|
|
#8
11-13-2021, 12:38 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 06:05 PM |
| Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
| Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
| Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-03-2010 07:58 PM |
| Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 07:23 PM |
Hybrid Mode
