![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom---I think you supplied most if not all the pics of the 56 variants on this site. Do you have additional "flat heads" beyond those pictured ?
http://baseballcardvariationsguidebo...wordpress.com/ |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Found another 1967…..I’ll call it the swimming in ink version…..
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
If anyone wants it, and can handle a 24 MB email, send your email address to me and I will attach it for you. Mine is billingtw@sbcglobal.net. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sigh....
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks to Tom and Larry for pointing these out to me in posts above
![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You're welcome Al, I like your quad-fecta of Stews...now I have one more to go find.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Given the length of this thread my guess is this one may be in here somewhere, but I just found this "bearded Bailey" while looking through a large group of '75's. Based on an Ebay search, it seems to reoccur fairly regularly.
__________________
Successful transactions with: Chesboro41, jimivintage, Bocabirdman, marcdelpercio, Jollyelm, Smanzari, asoriano, pclpads, joem36, nolemmings, t206blogcom, Northviewcats, Xplainer, Kickstand19, GrayGhost, btcarfango, Brian Van Horn, USMC09, G36, scotgreb, tere1071, kurri17, wrm, David James, tjenkins, SteveWhite, OhioCard Collector, sysks22, ejstel. Marty |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have an article I did comparing black backs vs. red backs in this set with scans. This one appears to have been cropped. It is the only one that seems to have this issue. The sky in the top one (black back) looks thicker than on the lower red back version. You can see the item at the very top left mostly NOT there in the lower version. I also see that the small gap at the upper left is wider in the red back version. The dark color on the lower left is thicker in the red back version.
Why was this cropped and none of the others? Last edited by Sliphorn; 11-16-2021 at 09:15 AM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That is awesome, I would call it the Wooly Bailey variant.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 06:05 PM |
Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-03-2010 07:58 PM |
Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 07:23 PM |