![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It seems like virtually every product launch is spoken for before it even comes out. The wholesale focus of Topps sucks and it's even worse now that Topps factors secondhand market value into their initial launch. The last Sapphire boxes retailed for over $300 I think.
Last edited by packs; 08-23-2021 at 03:49 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm so glad I grew up in the era of buying wax packs and cello packs, and didn't have to compete with adults fighting in parking lots over "product"!
Last edited by jgannon; 08-23-2021 at 05:56 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Plenty of people will want them, and I suspect they'd sell rather well IF the set were done right. You'd probably even see more growth in the hobby by drawing in more kids, who'd actually be able to find packs here and there. This would assure more long term, generational interest in the hobby in the future. What you wouldn't see is the clamoring, in-store childishness and all the "hot breaks" videos and buy-ins, along with almost instantaneous and ridiculous mark-ups for new product on the secondary market along with it's attendant impact on vintage pricing. To me, that'd be win-win. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If you are one who buys into the hobby-only, super limited contrived scarcity thing - well then yeah. You might not want those cards.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Responding to this and the post above, color me skeptical that kids will ever again be into collecting pieces of cardboard with athlete photos on them simply for the sake of having them, at least on anything approaching a mass scale. That's not how 21st century kids relate to sports, or the broader world around them for that matter. I know this is not a unique view around here. Also - even if cultivating a base of youth collectors were a viable strategy, when do corporations ever focus on long-term sustainable development over short-term windfalls these days? |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If it remains purely or even mostly about the money (and I have no reason to believe it won't...) then any type of physical distribution strategy may not be of concern to Fanatics or anyone else. They are just going to maximize profit and move on to the next thing when whatever it is is no longer grandly profitable.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Payment Plans For Cards? | Seven | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 10-29-2020 09:35 AM |
Changing collecting habits or thinking about getting out altogether? | Throttlesteer | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 54 | 06-21-2019 08:44 AM |
Is anyone else changing their collecting habits? | JustinD | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 07-03-2016 10:55 AM |
Change of plans... WTB 52-56 Topps and Bowman lots VGEX or better | mid50sbaseball | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-03-2016 08:25 PM |
Any plans for an Old Judge Book? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-22-2006 07:17 PM |