![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Overrated: 1954 Topps. I’ve posted this many times. I look at sets as to how I would have received them as a kid enjoying his hobby and his sport at the time. This set has hideous player selection, is stuffed full of old men coaches, and lacks most all players of the AL Champ Indians team that won 111 games. As ten year-olds or whatever, we would not have yet appreciated or foreseen the greatness of Henry Aaron, Al Kaline and Ernie Banks– the only saving graces from the set. I get the contract dispute with Bowman as a cause, but c’mon man.
Dishonorable mention: 1975 Topps. Loud colors for their own sake, not coordinated by team, were a turnoff for me. Many of us sorted by team and it was great to have the color coordination as was found in ‘66, ‘68, ‘69, ‘71, ‘72 and ‘74, which were during the primary years of my collecting. Underrated: 1974 Topps, 1966 Topps. I really like the designs of these two. As others mentioned, the ‘74s have some really great shots. Favorite: 1966 Topps. My first year of collecting probably has much to do with it. Too bad Topps had not come to grips with the fact that the Yankees cannot be in the World Series every year so they omitted, that one year only, what would have been a great W.S. subset. Also unfortunate that Angels and Braves were mostly hatless due to team/city name changes. Still, the set is so clean and crisp, IMHO, that it ranks numero uno for me. Least favorite. 1978 Topps. Hate most everything about it. Too many cards, and the design looks like it came from a kid who realized his homework assignment was due in 30 minutes and he had to come up with something. Script team names and a little baseball with abbreviated position. There’s simple, and then there’s lazy.
__________________
Now watch what you say, or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal Won't you sign up your name? We'd like to feel you're acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Overrated: 1954 Topps. A trio of iconic players' rookie cards but I absolutely hate the missing top border.
Underrated: 1963 Fleer. Yes, no major rookie in the set aside from Wills, but the player representation couldn't be better. Missing Mantle but does contain most of the greatest players of the era. In my opinion it has a great image selection too. Favorite: 1959 Topps. Gorgeous cards, common and star alike. Least Favorite: Hate the 1962 Topps set. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Overrated: 1952 Topps. It's amazing how cachet clouds vision.
Underrated: 1963 Fleer. Clean, attractive alternative with some big stars. I also like 1984 Fleer for its streamlined "Scandinavian" design. Favorite: 1954 Topps? 1952 Bowman? Least Favorite: 1961 Topps. zzzzzzzzzzz |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Overrated: 1971 Topps.
The folks in Duryea, PA had no business handing out a black bordered set to kids. So short-sighted. You look at them wrong, and the cards start turning white. Just a ridiculously poor move. Find a random stack of cards from any other year, and there's a good chance some (a lot) of them will look nice. Find a stack of 71's in your closet, and it doesn't matter how nice the action shots are, each and every card will have white rounded corners and edges and look like deteriorated garbage. However, in the graded card world we live in today, the set skyrockets to one of my most favorites ever, but that's simply because with the cards sitting in their protective prisons, there's no chance now of them deteriorating right before my eyes. Underrated: 1960 Topps. This set grew on me so much, so quickly that I started a thread about it a couple of years ago. It's definitely one that needs to be re-examined by the haters. https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=270971 Favorite: 1972 Topps (hands down). Also love 1965 and think 1974 was a beautiful stroke of genius, with the mix of colors and all the terrific action shots. Near perfection. Least Favorite: 1959 Topps. For the love of god, who at Topps said, "You know what, let's squeeze each picture into a tiny circle and eliminate a huge portion of the image area by blocking it out with wall of color!!"??????
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which Play Ball set is your favorite, and which one is your least favorite? | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 02-20-2019 02:18 PM |
Which regular issue Topps set is your favorite/least favorite. | Cardboard Junkie | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 32 | 03-18-2013 11:14 AM |
overrated and underrated | Touch'EmAll | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 25 | 09-24-2012 12:26 PM |
Show your favorite card in your not so favorite holder | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 05-06-2008 11:38 AM |
What are your favorite cards of your favorite players? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 47 | 04-13-2002 04:12 PM |