|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
At what point does alteration with cards become acceptable in the way it has with vintage comics? The problem in grading between the two hobbies (at least as I understand it; I don't know a ton about comics besides my lower grade raw collection of vintage MAD magazines...) is that the card hobby is still trying in many cases to put over altered cards as unaltered in numbered, regular slabs. Whereas with comics it's more acceptable for pages to be restored, etc. I get that a trading card is different than a comic in that it's just one piece of ephemera, not multiple pages stapled together. But at some point if this just keeps happening, would it not make sense to treat them the same? I know that "restored" comics go for less than true high grade unaltered, but in our hobby it's kind of the same thing already. A lightly trimmed Mantle card in an A holder that appears NM or better to the naked eye still isn't going to be cheap, if you know what I mean - even if it doesn't sell for the same heights as a truly unaltered PSA 7.
I see both sides of the argument. If we don't complain, "whine" about it, then the skulduggery aspect of this on the card side is unlikely to change. However, it's unlikely to change in reality based on what we have seen over the past 3-5 years anyway, isn't it? So is our only real hangup that we have this deception aspect of grading in our hobby where some other types of collectibles have moved on from that? Me personally, I'm basically too small time to make a difference. I enjoy mid-to lower grade postwar vintage on a budget, for the most part. I've gotten pissed at graders (mostly SGC) lately, but more to do with their defective slabs and yo-yo pricing models. From here on out, I will likely be focusing mainly on lower grade, raw vintage from sellers that I have already grown to trust online. That way I figure both prices and risk of alteration can remain low. I would agree we are in a very odd place in the hobby with this as an issue right now...
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
and There is only one side to the "argument". Either a card is altered or it is not altered, the opinion of the opinion seller has no bearing on that fact and has been proven time and again to be no better or worse than those of many of us, except that they just get paid more for theirs, even when it's shown to be wrong. And yes Mark17, I'm re-stating my sentiment, much of which we all agree on, in a new thread every few days accomplishing probably nothing. Last edited by doug.goodman; 04-19-2021 at 11:40 PM. Reason: Because I'm a dick |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I would think we would all like to agree that altered cards in numbered slabs is a bad thing, but my point in saying what you quoted was if in time, if altered or restored as is used in the comic hobby filters over more to cards, will this somehow reduce the rate of altered cards fraudulently getting into numbered slabs? It may not, but that's what I was questioning.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 04-20-2021 at 07:21 AM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It would sicken you over the years how many times I've heard I don't what was done to the card if it's in a holder with a number grade. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
One of those things I think that is certainly not ideal, but reality.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I posted earlier in this thread but I’ll repeat because it seems to apply here. If the graders are under trained/ uninformed/ incompetent then maybe you could see some changes and improvements made in the grading process. If, however, they are simply corrupt (handing out grades to high volume submitters, etc.) that’s a different story.
Last edited by Arazi4442; 04-20-2021 at 09:58 AM. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'll pose another question simply out of ignorance, but has this type of problem (the alteration fraud being made worse with TPG's complicit...) ever occurred before in professional grading with stamps or coins? I don't know much about them, but the American Philatelic Society has a pretty lofty reputation. In an organization like that, is it simply because collectors / historians have a louder voice than dealers and those purely in it with the main goal of driving prices higher?
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 04-20-2021 at 12:13 PM. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The main person doing the altering was brazen enough to have a vanity plate that read "Stamp MD" A bunch of firings, criminal charges etc followed by a lot of hard work restored peoples confidence in them. https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...069-story.html |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
When I saw some of those clearly short cards in the D. Thorn thread on Blowout, I was convinced they had a self-service line.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I’m sure it is, with so many examples it almost has to be both to some extent. But I doubt it’s a 50/50 split. My guess would be 80/20, leaning towards corrupt just based on the large batch groups of altered, graded submittals from BO.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
AND How many people who worship at the altar of the slab would pay for such opinions, and after receiving them, keep the card in the slab? Doug "It's laughable, so I laugh" Goodman Last edited by doug.goodman; 04-20-2021 at 03:41 PM. Reason: Because although it would have been a brilliant pun, it wasn't. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 04-20-2021 at 01:37 PM. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Can I still claim it as a brilliant pun? |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dean's Cards - Deja Vu All Over Again | Yoda | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 44 | 11-20-2018 06:58 PM |
| Deja Vu All Over Again | Yoda | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-14-2017 09:57 AM |
| Déjà Vu All Over Again | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 11 | 09-12-2015 10:13 AM |
| It's deja vu all over again........ | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-13-2014 09:45 AM |
| Recolored Card | Pat R | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 07-14-2012 02:33 PM |