PWCC Huigens Now Has a Criminal Defense Attorney

[MULLINS5]

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss

It is my understanding that the pwcc letter was not sent to blowout, but rather was provided to (one or more) investors in an effort to validate value and to disclose the situation.

Almost sounds like they're trying to assess damages to Blowout or the posters.

[conor912]

Originally Posted by MULLINS5

Almost sounds like they're trying to assess damages to Blowout or the posters.

Ah, the old “the truth is not the problem, but rather the person pointing out said truth” defense. Wonder where I’ve seen that before.

[MULLINS5]

Looks like the card owner contacted Brent with concerns, Brent suggested the card go back to Beckett, Beckett confirmed grade, Brent then writes a letter saying he believes the card has lost half if it's value due to Blowout (not specifically named) and now the owner wants talks about the card's alterations to stop. Brent didn't have to put anything about value in the letter, all he had to do was say the card checked out, but instead he wants his customer to put heat onto the message board. Unprofessional and petty.