 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#6
09-03-2019, 06:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
https://www.psacard.com/pop/multi-sp...e-series/49281
Here's another set from the same years that has been graded pretty heavily for a multisport issue. The cardstock is much thinner than a T206, but out of 1619 cards for the 1909 (first editions) and 445 for 1910, highest grade is 8.5. Total of 2064. 8.5: 1 8: 9 (plus some qualifiers) 7.5: 4 7: 46 6.5: 5 6: 69 I graded and own the 8.5 and half the 8s; most came out of a really nicely collated set I bought from Kit Young that looked fine to me before I submitted them. So there are NM-MT examples that have survived all this time, but I agree with your premise that it's likely many of the high grade T206 cards in PSA 8-10 holders have been altered/trimmed over time.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help solve argument with Greg- botn | 1952boyntoncollector | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 38 | 07-10-2016 05:56 PM |
| 19th century tobacco insert cards | jerrys | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 10-04-2013 07:07 PM |
| Is this argument bunk? | mintacular | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 07-27-2010 10:29 AM |
| 4 Tobacco Insert Coupons | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 11-09-2007 07:28 PM |
| Rarity argument at work today | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 08-25-2006 12:27 PM |
Threaded Mode