![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Unfortunately mistakes do occur. Similar thing happened to me with a high grade e106 I sent in to SGC...came back A...I sold it...they resent...came back like a 6 I think. I was pissed. Life goes on.
Sadly with many buying only slabbed cards there's no way one can become versed at detecting alterations when a card is in a slab! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by CMIZ5290; 05-28-2018 at 04:16 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting considering it was just pointed out that PSA made the exact same error on the Wallace.
Last edited by Gobucsmagic74; 05-28-2018 at 04:43 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not at all Dan, PSA is human as well, absolutely. What I get sick and tired of is hearing about how great SGC is on this forum, how corrupt PSA is, and most of the SGC supporters say, "I love the SGC holders (really?), they are more consistant than PSA, and I dont care about resale value, just the card... Really? How much sense does that make? What percentage of members on this board value their money? Answer....100%.
Last edited by CMIZ5290; 05-28-2018 at 04:58 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I may be wrong but couldn't you at one time have had a card slabbed as authentic only without paying extra for the numerical grade? This may be a case where original slabber did that to save a few bucks and just protect the card...
__________________
Successful B/S/T deals with asoriano, obcbobd, x2dRich2000, eyecollectvintage, RepublicaninMass, Kwikford, Oneofthree67, jfkheat, scottglevy, whitehse, GoldenAge50s, Peter Spaeth, Northviewcats, megalimey, BenitoMcNamara, Edwolf1963, mightyq, sidepocket, darwinbulldog, jasonc, jessejames, sb1, rjackson44, bobbyw8469, quinnsryche, Carter08, philliesfan and ALBB, Buythatcard and JimmyC so far. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You still have the ability to declare "slab as authentic" even if it makes a number grade, but I don't think the submitters of these cards would have done that. These are not cards to be ashamed of and label as authentic instead of giving a number.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
You’d be surprised how different people view lower grades versus a nice looking slabbed authentic card. It would be interesting to know from the flip if it was assigned a A or the A was chosen by the submitter. I have purchased a few PSA A cards that were purposely slabbed without a numeric grade. I have resubmitted 3 and all 3 received a numeric grade (although they were lower grade Venezuela Topps). Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Many times lower grade cards aren't slabbed as they bring more money raw..
..in hopes of high(er) grades that they really aren't ![]() Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 05-29-2018 at 06:24 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mistake | hcv123 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-14-2018 09:49 PM |
Bad mistake by PSA? | Baseball Fan | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 17 | 02-27-2016 11:12 PM |
This is a mistake by BVG, right? | pbspelly | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-18-2014 11:15 AM |
mistake | daviddbreadman | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 11-09-2009 05:04 PM |
A mistake, again! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 09-26-2005 07:42 AM |