![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You could have quit after your very first sentence. The reason that card issue was private was because I didn't have firsthand knowledge and, if there WAS an issue, I was trying to help Bob by telling him to just deal with it quietly and quickly, as I would anyone who "might" have made a mistake or had some kind of issue. But it was private for reason. If I recall correctly, I was told the card was reported stolen but then Bob had it. Bob disputed that, the other member didn't want to get into it, so I let it go. The card was posted on the board at one time, for some reason, or I wouldn't have even discussed it at all.
Then Bob put that in his tagline to antagonize me and I was just letting it go.... (your name is by your post, thanks) Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 08-20-2016 at 07:46 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leon, I don't know. I guess if it all seems so vague regarding this lost or stolen card why bring it up at all is what I am saying unless someone wants to press forward with hard facts. The mere appearance of impropriety can stick and tarnish reputations. I do know that Bob would not bother with trying to steal a signed golf card, but let's hear it out or say there is no truth to it. By the way Leon, thanks for creating a fantastic board. I am trying to learn all I can from so much knowledge here on pre war card experts. I collect post war basketball football hockey only at this time but I am trying to expand my collecting interests to Prewar which I don't know a lot about but trying to learn all the time. I don't post much in this section because I don't have much important to say right now.
David Lamont Last edited by sushihotwings; 08-20-2016 at 08:08 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
THere was NO APPEARANCE TO START WITH. All messages were PMs or emails.
It was supposed to be private. There was NO appearance until BOB and YOU posted it publicly. None, nadda....get it? It was private. No ones reputation was tarnished. And I didn't say he tried to steal a card, I have no idea and wasn't there. And no, I don't think he would try to steal a card but according to the other member, as already stated, it was lost or reported stolen and then shown on the board (*as if owned). YOU are the one mentioning it and saying it publicly. I didn't create the board but you are welcome for it being here.... Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 08-20-2016 at 08:40 AM. Reason: to be more clear |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The first time I saw it was in the cat picture thread and it was not by me. If it was mentioned earlier I missed it. The first time I made any mention of it on this forum or anywhere was just now, in this thread, about 10 minutes ago. Apparently there has been no resolution or desire to bring charges any further so why bring it up again yesterday without anyone willing to back it up or desire to carry through on it? I only brought it up because it was previously mentioned like there may or may not be truth to it. Well if there is truth, set it free and let Bob respond or never bring it up again. That is what I am saying. From what I understand Leon you are vouching or willing to give your friend the benefit of the doubt which is fine. I would too. Same thing with Jason calling Bob "nuts" Let Bob respond if he wants. But he can't now being banned. But if the person with the lost or stolen or otherwise golf card doesn't want to take it up why bring it up again again yesterday in the cat thread?I have never mentioned it until this morning. If there is more to it lets hear it. Otherwise Bob deserves a chance to respond to a mention again yesterday about it (not by me)
David Lamont |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know nothing about the golf card but Leon did not surface it in the Cat thread, someone else brought it up first.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You are making assumptions. I said I knew the guy 15-17 yrs so yes, that was insinuating I believed him. But I didn't accuse Bob of anything, only if there was an issue it should be taken care of. IF that issue was a mistake on the other guys part, he should have cleared it up with the other guy. This was all being done privately, no reputation being supposedly tarnished.
I brought it up because members asked about it and why the suspension. Well, antagonizing me, or anyone all around the board, is one reason but not usually a very good one. I take that day in and day out and it's usually not a big deal. But that is why it was brought up. I found the old PMs, just now, and everything I have said I have verified. I am done answering questions. Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 08-20-2016 at 09:10 AM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's cool. If Leon decides to allow Bob to come back at some point and Bob wants to defend himself that is up to Bob at this point. Otherwise there isn't much more to say unless someone wants to clarify their issue with him (aside from the cat picture) which nobody including me enjoys. Peace.
David Lamont |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here's my 10 cents, my two cents is free...
Animals get hit by cars all the time - I hate the times when I've been the one driving, and I cringe when I see an animal by the side of the road. But IMO some people are wound a little tight on the cat picture. There was no animal abuse or cruelty in the picture, merely what some (many?) believe is bad taste. I don't begrudge those feelings at all - everyone is entitled to their beliefs. Me, I have always found humor in that picture. It's been around for a LONG time. Maybe I (and others who find similar humor) are a little twisted, and I'm okay if you think that. I like irreverent humor and humor that pokes a little fun at difficult situations or subjects. It helps lighten, at least to me, what can sometimes be a pretty tough world. And again, if that type of humor doesn't jive with you, that's cool. That said, the torches and pitchforks that came out in the other thread were juuuuuuust a little over the top. To quote the late, great Sergeant Hulka, "Lighten up, Francis".
__________________
OBC (oldbaseball.com) member since 1996... looking for a low-budget T205 Irvin Wilhelm w/ "suffered" Scans of my Brooklyn Dodger collection |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Geez point taken.....can we all move on now. (Not directed at Leon)
Last edited by whitehse; 08-20-2016 at 09:09 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is this Mel Ott good???? | tlake22 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 3 | 09-28-2015 08:36 PM |
Good? | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-20-2015 01:07 PM |
Good Cards of Great Players in not so good Condition (BARGAIN LOT) | Misunderestimated | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-14-2010 05:59 PM |
Good News for a good guy | Rich Klein | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-02-2009 07:06 AM |
good or bad | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-13-2006 04:01 AM |