![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
trying not to set boundaries, but you are entering into the realm of variants which i think negate it from being removed. plus there is a 91 stadium club, so i gotta leave it at this point... |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not sure if still true but there was a time when 92 Bowman Chipper Jones cost more than 91 Bowman.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As in Ghostbusters, crossing the streams is bad (comparing Bowmans to Topps, for example), and it makes it difficult to reasonably compare '48-'51 Bowmans to '51-'52 Topps. So if we shouldn't compare inter-company cards (and I basically agree with that), then we are left comparing intra-company cards. Which then also means that we will at times be comparing second cards to first cards and maybe not true 'rookie' cards. With that in mind, I think most if not all First/RC from the '51 Topps set would be less than those from the '52 set in similar condition.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
most valuable signed cards | theshleps | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 9 | 03-30-2015 05:32 PM |
Most Valuable Cards in the hobby | Yankeefan51 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 58 | 01-06-2013 04:55 PM |
1970's Topps most valuable cards | trobba | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 17 | 12-05-2009 04:02 PM |
Best year for Rookies? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 21 | 02-29-2008 03:57 PM |
Protect your valuable cards . . . | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-21-2004 04:38 PM |