second year cards more valuable than rookies?

[HOF Auto Rookies]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

71 Bench in high grade is worth more than the rookie.

Condition sensitivity? I totally forgot that aspect.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[begsu1013]

same grade. it's up there.

i noted the mantle.

i think the munson is a fantastic example.

especially considering the 71 8 almost doubles what a 70 9 goes for!

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by begsu1013

same grade.

Yes, Bench 8 in 1971 sells for more than Bench 8 in 1968 I believe.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by HOF Auto Rookies

Condition sensitivity? I totally forgot that aspect.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, exactly. Or in the case of the 52 high numbers (Campanella example), just plain relative scarcity.

[HOF Auto Rookies]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Yes, exactly. Or in the case of the 52 high numbers (Campanella example), just plain relative scarcity.

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

52T Campanella probably worth more across the board than his 49B

And that 49 Bowman set is so unattractive. Right, makes sense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[quitcrab]

Kind if strenching it here ...1967 and 1971 Brooks Robinson sell for as much as his 57 rookie ...especially the 71

[quitcrab]

Kind of strenching it here ...1967 and 1971 Brooks Robinson sell for as much as his 57 rookie ...especially the 71

[glynparson]

A 1965 fritz ankley is worth more than a 1964 and a 1973 Ron cry is worth more than a 1972.

[Rich Klein]

Way Back in the day:

1990 Leaf Steve Avery > 1989 Topps Avery

1992 Stadium Club Brett Favre: 1991 Stadium Club Favre

Don't know prices of today

Rich

[ls7plus]

Getting back to the original question, I would assume that Gabby Hartnett's second year card, from the very tough '23-24 Exhibits issue, would be worth more than his rookie 1922 W-strip card. I have the former. Anyone actually aware of a sale of the latter? Great, underrated catcher, by the way.

Best to all,

Larry

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by glynparson

A 1965 fritz ankley is worth more than a 1964 and a 1973 Ron cry is worth more than a 1972.

lol

[clydepepper]

Not his second-year card, but I bet the 1953 Bowman Pee Wee Reese card is noticeably more valuable than his RC (1948 Leaf?). - and that's probably just based on the cards' appearances.
.
.

[clydepepper]

Originally Posted by quitcrab

Kind of strenching it here ...1967 and 1971 Brooks Robinson sell for as much as his 57 rookie ...especially the 71

1967 was the last year that the different series were released separately, and the last or high series had shorter production runs.

1971 is possibly the most condition sensitive Post WWII set but it still shouldn't be more than the underappreciated 1957 set which was a landmark as the first set of what has become the standard 2.5 x 3.5 size.
.
.

[Peter_Spaeth]

In high grade at least 57 Brooks go for much more than 71.