second year cards more valuable than rookies?

[Peter_Spaeth]

71 Bench in high grade is worth more than the rookie.

[HOF Auto Rookies]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

71 Bench in high grade is worth more than the rookie.

Condition sensitivity? I totally forgot that aspect.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[begsu1013]

same grade. it's up there.

i noted the mantle.

i think the munson is a fantastic example.

especially considering the 71 8 almost doubles what a 70 9 goes for!

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by begsu1013

same grade.

Yes, Bench 8 in 1971 sells for more than Bench 8 in 1968 I believe.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by HOF Auto Rookies

Condition sensitivity? I totally forgot that aspect.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, exactly. Or in the case of the 52 high numbers (Campanella example), just plain relative scarcity.

[HOF Auto Rookies]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Yes, exactly. Or in the case of the 52 high numbers (Campanella example), just plain relative scarcity.

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

52T Campanella probably worth more across the board than his 49B

And that 49 Bowman set is so unattractive. Right, makes sense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[quitcrab]

Kind if strenching it here ...1967 and 1971 Brooks Robinson sell for as much as his 57 rookie ...especially the 71

[quitcrab]

Kind of strenching it here ...1967 and 1971 Brooks Robinson sell for as much as his 57 rookie ...especially the 71

[glynparson]

A 1965 fritz ankley is worth more than a 1964 and a 1973 Ron cry is worth more than a 1972.

[Rich Klein]

Way Back in the day:

1990 Leaf Steve Avery > 1989 Topps Avery

1992 Stadium Club Brett Favre: 1991 Stadium Club Favre

Don't know prices of today

Rich

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by glynparson

A 1965 fritz ankley is worth more than a 1964 and a 1973 Ron cry is worth more than a 1972.

lol

[clydepepper]

Originally Posted by quitcrab

Kind of strenching it here ...1967 and 1971 Brooks Robinson sell for as much as his 57 rookie ...especially the 71

1967 was the last year that the different series were released separately, and the last or high series had shorter production runs.

1971 is possibly the most condition sensitive Post WWII set but it still shouldn't be more than the underappreciated 1957 set which was a landmark as the first set of what has become the standard 2.5 x 3.5 size.
.
.

[Peter_Spaeth]

In high grade at least 57 Brooks go for much more than 71.

[Peter_Spaeth]

52T Campanella probably worth more across the board than his 49B

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

52T Campanella probably worth more across the board than his 49B

I think you got to go by the same card company...where the 2nd year is worth more than the rookie....its a bit unfair to compare bowman 'rookie' with Topps (pseudo rookie ie. First Topps Card')

You dont see 'first bowman card' for a reason...you only see first topps card...

[begsu1013]

71 is not bench's second year, but nevertheless a good call.

and it would be nice to keep it the same company but even that's asking too much, i think

perfect world, same company, same grade and keeping it rookie year vs second year...

but it's hard to put any boundaries here, so throw out anything ya got...

even the 71 bench 8. ; )

[Peter_Spaeth]

In general I would think these could yield any other examples.
1. Where the RC is an undesirable black and white issue like 39PB (Ted) or 48B with no corresponding Leaf (Berra).
2. Where the later card is a scarce high number.
3. Where the later card is in a condition sensitive set but none comes to mind except 71T.

[begsu1013]

definitely agree.

i think any examples produced will be products of the 52t, condition sensitive sets like the 71 or simply rc's that happened to land in an unattractive set.

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by begsu1013

definitely agree.

i think any examples produced will be products of the 52t, condition sensitive sets like the 71 or simply rc's that happened to land in an unattractive set.

you mean unattractive set of a different company...if its the same company is going to have to be a condition sensitive etc