![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Basic question here, but I couldn't find the answer. Do we know the printing year for each of the backs? I know the Polar Bears are from 1910, but otherwise is it just 150 series is 1909, 350 series 1910, and 460 series 1911? And what about the backs that don't identify the number of subjects?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The following is the results of my research. I don't claim that it's 100 % accurate, but it should be very close. T206 back ....................... Year issued AMERICAN BEAUTY 350 ...... 1910 AMERICAN BEAUTY 460....... 1911 BROAD LEAF 350 & 460 ...... 1910 CAROLINA BRIGHTS ........... 1910 CYCLE 350 & 460 ............... 1910 DRUM ............................... 1910 EL PRINCIPE de GALES ........ 1909 - 1910 Brown HINDU ..................... 1909 Red HINDU ......................... 1910 LENOX ............................... 1911 OLD MILL ........................... 1909 - 1910 -1911 PIEDMONT ......................... 1909 - 1910 -1911 POLAR BEAR ...................... 1910 SOVEREIGN ....................... 1909 - 1910 SWEET CAPORAL ................ 1909 - 1910 TOLSTOI ........................... 1910 -1911 UZIT ........................... ..... 1911 TED Z . |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there any rhyme or reason to how players were selected for a particular back? I know that with the more common backs you can pretty much be assured that essentially every player would have one of those backs. I find it odd though how some of the best players of the day aren't found on some of the rarer backs. Obviously back then they didn't have the hindsight that we do in regards to this person and that person being in the hall of fame but it would still stand to reason that it would simply be good business to have the best players represented preferentially on ALL of the back variations not just a smattering here and there. It makes no sense to me why some of the more mediocre players would be representing Drum, Uzit or some other rarer back while many of the best players of the era were not.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FYI....T206 PIEDMONT factory 25 & factory 42 confirmed lists | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 04-11-2016 08:50 AM |
T206 sweet cap 150 factory 25 backs, Tougher than we think? | CMIZ5290 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 55 | 09-20-2012 04:12 PM |
Opinions on t206 sweet cap 350-460 factory 25 backs | CMIZ5290 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 03-26-2012 06:39 AM |
Were PIEDMONT 460 factory #42 & UZIT backs printed simultaneously ? | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 11-10-2011 11:25 AM |
New T206 brand? | 4815162342 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-11-2010 09:52 PM |