![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I find it very interesting, that all of the DIFFERENT-2-NAMES cards that have been reported here are limited to ONLY from
the 150/350 series, or the 350-only series. Furthermore, the TWO-NAME T206's that have been reported here from the 350/460 series and the 460-only series are all SAME-NAME cards. Here's an additional 350/460 series SAME-NAME card to add to this list. OLD MILL ![]() My question is: why haven't we seen any DIFFERENT-2-NAMES cards from the 350/460 series, or the 460-only series ? TED Z . |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great question, Ted. It's not from a lack of looking, because I certainly hunt. Perhaps the sheets in the 460 runs had the same player/pose in each column thereby making it impossible for a two-namer. Or perhaps we just haven't found one yet. If I were to lean in one direction, at this point I might just go with the "not possible" (same card vertically). I will keep looking, however!
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
A total of only 21 cards from the 350/460 series and the 460-only series in this entire thread is an insufficient sample. So, we will keep searching. However, I consider your "columns" point also possible, as it is consistent with my hypothetical sheet of the Exclusive 12 cards illustrated here..... ![]() TED Z . |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Good question. Might be because of the limited player selection in the 350/460 series and 460-only series that no two different name T206s have been found. Same player-same column. As you and others have mentioned, possibly smaller sheets and only a few players per sheet. Selection of players limited in late 1910 to 1911 because they were wrapping up the print run for the new card set that they were replacing the T206s with. All speculation of course, but it sure makes for a good mystery to solve. ![]() As Er!ck has posted, I'm also looking for that first 350/460 or 460 two different name T206 to appear, but nothing yet. Nice selection of two same namers with different backs. ![]() Here is another mis-cut with a back not seen often. (not my card) Jantz |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here is the list. Slight typo on earlier post - 52 total
American Beauty 350 framed Hinchman, H. - Taylor Cycle 350 Beck - Unglaub Piedmont 150 Bender (port.) - Delehanty (Wash.) Brown, M (port.) - Magee (port.) Bradley (port.) - Bender (port.) Killian (pitching) - Chance (red port.) Lindaman - Bresnahan (port.) Lundgren (Cubs) - Doolin Lundgren (Cubs) - Ball (New York) Powell (horizontal) - O'Leary (port.) Spade - Cicotte Hinchman, B. - Stovall (port.) Manning (batting) - Flick Piedmont 350 Abbaticchio (brown) - Cicotte Atz - Hoffman (Providence) Chase (blue port.) - Zimmerman Hoblitzell - Stephens Jennings (port.) - Jordan (port.) Livingstone - Maloney McElveen - Dygert Elberfeld (NY port.) - Parent Engle - Phillippe McGraw (no cap port.) - Chesbro Moran, H. - Arrellanes Oakes - Easterly Snodgrass (batting) - Maddox Rossman - McBride Turner - Lobert Egan - Warhop Herzog (NY) - Ritchey McGinley - Speaker Griffith (port.) - Chase (?) Jackson - Hoffman (St. Louis) Butler - Raymond McIntyre (Detroit) - Hoffman (St. Louis) Walsh - Brown, M (port.) Chance (yellow port.) - Feine (?) Delehanty (Wash.) - Waddell (port.) Sweet Caporal 350-30 Barbeau - Strang Graham (St. Louis) - Clark (Columbus) Killian (port.) - Dubuc McGlynn - Jones (Detroit) Rossman - Thomas Wagner, Heinie (left shoulder) - Schlei (catching) Sweet Caporal 350-25 Lennox - Clancy Sweet Caporal - factory number unknown McGraw (front ?) - Hayden Pickering - Myers (front ) Bowerman - Chance (front ?) The rest - back information unknown or damaged Walsh - Lumley Piedmont (back damage - no series number) Bresnahan (port.) - Doolin Criger - Ritchey Keeler (front ?) - McGraw (front ?) I think I got all this information posted correctly. If anyone spots a discrepancy or can add anything else, please post it up. Jantz Last edited by Jantz; 10-03-2014 at 09:15 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is a really weak example, but it is a two-namer. It is the second instance of Bender-Delehanty. Note that there are several printing attributes that demonstrate on both instances:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wow nice sleuthing! I would have never picked up on that Bender.
__________________
http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/schneids |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You're literally connecting the dots aren't you?
![]() Nice work Er!ck! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
strikes again!
![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Updates below:
Quote:
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As promised - scnas of my McGraw-Chesbro Piedmont 350 Card - now I gotta go and look closer to see if I missed any!
Enjoy! Eggo |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks! That was a known combo, so it may be a second occurrence. Appreciate the scans.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks Eggo for posting the scans!
Here is the other McGraw/Chesbro that was found. Same back as yours. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
t206 Double Names | Jaybird | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 03-27-2011 12:05 PM |
T206 SGC Graded Cards For Sale... | iggyman | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 7 | 08-16-2010 04:57 PM |
t206 Southern League Team names | usernamealreadytaken | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-02-2010 05:02 PM |
www.T206museum and Collector Linked to Fake T206 Overprints. | wonkaticket | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 73 | 05-09-2009 08:16 PM |
T206 Tannehill Miscut 2 Names Showing SOLD | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 05-22-2008 08:13 PM |