 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22
07-04-2014, 11:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I understand grading is subjective, but it's cards like the Cy Young that really confuse me. Everyone has their doubts about some grades, but the ones that no human on Earth should miss are the ones that anger me and make me question the company that grades them.
I know a lot of people go back and forth on PSA and SGC about their grades not being legitimate, but as long as they comply with their set grading standards, I don't see the problem (obvious hiccups do not apply  ). Not every company goes by the same standards, so it is unfair to judge them to one universal list.I collect graded cards from the big three and do it based on appeal and not the grade, so there is no bias over here 
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 Last edited by freakhappy; 07-04-2014 at 11:11 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Paper loss on Front = PSA 6 | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 05-24-2012 05:16 AM |
| PSA 5 with paper loss? | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 52 | 01-05-2012 06:34 PM |
| Flaking vs. paper loss | Orions father | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-13-2010 09:08 PM |
| paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-30-2006 02:09 AM |
| Crease or paper loss? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-01-2003 07:10 PM |
Threaded Mode