 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
07-03-2014, 07:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by CMIZ5290; 07-03-2014 at 07:42 PM. 
|
|
#2
07-03-2014, 07:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading.
|
|
#3
07-04-2014, 02:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have a PSA 4 T205 Schulte with pin holes you can see daylight through in all corners. IMO PSA is know for their lax grading standards. As long as the money keeps rolling in though it will continue.
__________________
Andrew Member since 2009
|
|
#4
07-04-2014, 02:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Many more cards graded
Equals many more mistakes.
|
|
#5
07-04-2014, 02:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
PSA Mistakes
Agreed! But when you grow in size as a company, your staff should grow accordingly in order to accommodate that growth in business. Especially with regard to fine vintage issues they ought to have some experts who are consistent in adhering to their published grading standards. Personally I believe SGC is far more accurate on a more consistent basis.
|
|
#6
07-04-2014, 05:29 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have a PSA 5 Old Judge card with two dots of paper loss on the front, one about the size of a pin head, one a little smaller. Got the card from a friend who just got it graded, so I know it was legit. The funny thing is I also bought a PSA 2 at the same time and it was much nicer than the 5
__________________
Please check out my books on baseball history. They include the bio of star second baseman Dots Miller. A book featuring 20 Moonlight Graham players who got into just one game. Another with 13 players who were with the Pittsburgh Pirates during the regular season, but never played a game. There's also one about 27 baseball families, as well as a day-by-day look at the worst team in Pittsburgh Pirates history. All five can be found here: https://www.amazon.com/stores/John-D...hor/B0DH87Q2DS
|
|
#7
07-04-2014, 06:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
We see the psa mistakes a lot more because there are ALOT
More. I honestly do not think the percentage is a lot higher the problem lies with the same horribly graded cards continue to be flipped because someone buys the card and hates it so they sell. Plus SGC is honestly more willing to admit a mistake and buy the card back. That I agree with 100%.
|
|
#8
07-06-2014, 11:02 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
OJ grades make no sense to me. The companies need to find a way to account for image quality. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Paper loss on Front = PSA 6 | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 05-24-2012 06:16 AM |
| PSA 5 with paper loss? | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 52 | 01-05-2012 07:34 PM |
| Flaking vs. paper loss | Orions father | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-13-2010 10:08 PM |
| paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-30-2006 03:09 AM |
| Crease or paper loss? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-01-2003 08:10 PM |
Hybrid Mode
