![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Let me preface what I am about to say by saying that I only collect SGC graded cards. I love the look of their holder/flip. I love their grading and their customer service, etc., etc. I am a customer.
So here's the question we all want an answer to: WHY CHANGE? I know what Sean said, but why make such a drastic change? Perhaps, perhaps they thought that if they made a dramatic change to the flip, that then collectors would send in their existing collection to be re-holdered so their existing collection would have uniformity going forward? Just a thought, but maybe it is more about creating a new revenue stream? I know most of us will say that they would never send in their existing cards for re-holdering, but as we have already seen, continuity is a very important issue to collectors. Just a thought.... |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Response | JP21 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 147 | 09-03-2013 09:01 AM |
Response to Allegations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 80 | 07-28-2012 01:39 PM |
SGC's Response | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-31-2007 06:35 PM |
SGC's Response | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 11-30-2006 08:27 PM |
Interesting response to PSA grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 11-22-2005 03:35 PM |