 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17
11-05-2013, 06:50 AM
|
||||
|
||||
John,
I just re-read your statement: “I guess this Bowerman was next to all the other machine or non-handcut cut Piedmont Wagner’s we have floating around.” I want to point out one important fact that escaped you – and that has great import with regard to assigning a percentage chance that the card contains a partial Wagner. It has been stated, that Wagner cards - WERE PRINTED AND THEN DESTROYED. So it is Not that only 50-100 Wagners were printed. Indeed Wagners may have been printed for weeks/months. There may have been thousands or tens of thousands. Given the speed of communication at that time, this may in fact be likely. It appears that to avoid legal action, the company ordered that the Wagners be “destroyed”. But the Bowermans, that may have been printed next to Wagner, were not destroyed. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 Walter Johnson Portrait /w Scarce Partial Factory 30 Number on Back PSA 3.5 | Sean1125 | T206 cards B/S/T | 12 | 08-23-2013 10:42 AM |
| Honus Wagner T206 Piedmont Back | BlueDevil89 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 01-10-2013 02:59 PM |
| t206 Wagner & 350 Piedmont Back | pirates60 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-11-2011 05:08 AM |
| T206 Honus Wagner with Chesterfield back? :) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-24-2009 06:52 PM |
| Is that freaking NASA T206 Wagner back? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-17-2002 10:19 AM |
Threaded Mode