|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Were these guys the best of their time or not | |||
| Barry Bonds was one of the best of his time |
|
73 | 65.18% |
| Barry bonds was NOT one of the best of his time |
|
20 | 17.86% |
| Roger Clemens was one of the best of his time |
|
80 | 71.43% |
| Roger Clemens was NOT one of the best of his time |
|
14 | 12.50% |
| Gary sheffield was one of the best of his time |
|
16 | 14.29% |
| Gary sheffield was NOT one of the best of his time |
|
71 | 63.39% |
| derek jeter was one of the best of his time |
|
79 | 70.54% |
| derek jeter was NOT one of the best of his time |
|
19 | 16.96% |
| cal ripken jr was one of the best of his time |
|
74 | 66.07% |
| cal ripken jr was NOT one of the best of his time |
|
26 | 23.21% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 112. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Obviously I can't ignore his steroid use. I only look at his pre 1999 numbers as legitimate. The story goes after 1998 when he saw all the attention that McGwire and Sosa got, he told other players that he was going to try it. I don't know exactly the words used but that's the basic message he said from what I heard and from 1999 on he was juiced up.....as much or more than anyone else!
Even so, when only comparing him to others of his time, his pre 1999 numbers are still fantastic in their own right, just not top 5 player immortal all time numbers!
__________________
Er1ck.L. ---D381 seeker http://www.flickr.com/photos/30236659@N04/sets/ |
|
|