 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
11-07-2020, 06:55 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Marked "AS-IS", no returns, and Unknown for Original/Replica. Still wouldn't get them out of an INAD case because they list it as a 1909-1911 card. I reported it for being counterfeit. Enough reports and they'll take it down.
But yes, it's a less obvious reprint/counterfeit than the last two outed in PSA slabs...
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Perhaps the most unethical thing I've seen in our hobby. Topps should be ashamed | the 'stache | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 72 | 11-07-2014 10:45 AM |
| Blatantly Hacked and Kudos to Rob Lifson PSA should be ashamed! | danmckee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 75 | 04-15-2013 06:12 PM |
Threaded Mode