![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for those miscuts. I can't tell for certain, but the Tiger team miscut may have Perry (598) to its left. The Nicholson miscut has either Franks (537), Tebbetts (552) or a rookie card underneath it. Since we know most of the cards surrounding rookie cards (except for 549 & 553), my suspicion is that it may be Tebbetts. I believe the Mantilla card is showing the top of Shirley/Jackson card (591).
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice one on Perry call. Do we know who is below Tigers team? That would be next to 595 Jackson.
Last edited by stlcardsfan; 07-12-2020 at 11:23 AM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Bob Sadowski is below the Tiger’s team card, Orlando McFarlane is to the right of the Tigers team card.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Can #525 Gary Bell be placed next to #546 Siebler under Choo Choo Coleman or is it believed that there may be two separate rows with Coleman? ETA, I get it now, Bell is in the fifth spot on either the Hoerner row or the Taylor row, much more likely the Hoerner row but can't be confirmed yet.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 07-12-2020 at 09:18 PM. Reason: Addition |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There must be more than one placement of the row with Coleman on the sheet.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Almost positive that Bell (525) is under Choo Choo and next to Siebler while 542 (Smith) is under Bell and next to 571 (Roberts). That would put Bell in the row with Hoerner Rookie Card (what I call row C). I also suspect that Bell is always under Choo Choo in this sheet configuration.
Based on PoP reports, and the various miscut info I've seen, I suspect that the row pattern on one half-sheet was A, B, C, D, E, A, F, G, B, C, D, E while on the other is was D, E, A, F, G, B, C, D, E, A, F, G. There is evidence that suggests row B was under both row A (northrup) and row G, which is why I prefer this configuration to others. A = Northrup row B = Perranowski row C = Hoerner row D = Taylor row E = Salmon row F = Mantilla row G = Shirley (591) row. I am almost positive that the strip 582, 597, 592, 549 is in row D and finishes that row (i.e. Columns 8, 9, 10, & 11) but need to see something to the right of 582 to confirm. The 3 card sequence 598, 583, 569 is pretty much guaranteed to be in either row B (perranowski) or row C (hoerner) as is the sequence 532, 552. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe that the Perranowski row is always above the Hoerner row on both half-slits, so the Bell card can be placed in row C under Choo Choo and next to Siebler. That puts George Smith (542) next to Roberts in row D. The Smith card should be under Bell in three rows but will be at the top of the 2nd half-slit. In other words, Smith is in row D and the pattern across the two half-slits or sheets is:
Slit A: A, B, C, D, E, A, F, G, B, C, D, E Slit B: D, E, A, F, G, B, C, D, E, A, F, G |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think the Sullivan is new, the McCovey-Williams is already known but I found another example.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Unless I am mistaken, it can only be Siebler, Roggenburk, or Queen to the left of Sullivan.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 07-12-2020 at 06:16 PM. Reason: Added scans |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thread # 158 and #166 queen and howser. The miscut seems the same, maybe queen is in that G row. It's always been a sleeper tough card along with 586 raymind.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1985 Topps Baseball Uncut Sheet w/ Puckett RC * 1987 Uncut Sheets in Box | mintacular | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 2 | 11-20-2017 01:22 PM |
Topps uncut sheets | mybestbretts | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 7 | 11-26-2014 12:30 PM |
1972 Topps uncut partial sheets | SAllen2556 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 07-07-2014 11:50 AM |
1955 Topps uncut sheets | chadeast | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 20 | 06-22-2012 08:52 AM |
1952-60 Uncut Topps Sheets | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 01-07-2008 02:46 PM |