![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is the main reason so few SGC cards have been discovered so far. I collect SGC cards more than most but have to believe the cards that did not get graded from PSA in all of those submissions went to SGC. I imagine a decent percentage of those are in SGC graded holders.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]()
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wasn't it the other way around, and that the "after" card had the rounded corners? If so, we're only talking about a few very minor stains being removed.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
It would be awesome if we could see the Moser/PWCC submissions. Here is what I know: >Submissions to PSA usually contained scores of cards. >There are multiple cards that have been worked on with numerical grades from SGC revealed in the Blowout forums I deduce - the submissions to SGC were likely multiple card submissions as were those to PSA. I deduce - More than what we know from each submission got through - otherwise SGC rejected all but one card - but did not raise a red flag that there was only one legit card mixed in with a bunch of alterations. Again I like SGC and have bought a lot of cards in their holders. I would like to have lists to check against like I do my PSA cards that I purchased from PWCC |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|