![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
VintageVinnie,
Post your real name!
__________________
EBAY STORE: ROOKIE-PARADE |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() That’s my real name. I am a real person. I encourage everyone to come meet me at the National. Love, Greg Campbell
__________________
EBAY STORE: ROOKIE-PARADE |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If SGC had implemented at least some sort of reason to their numbering system, the blow out guys would undoubtedly be able to find more cards from the doctored submissions.
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is the main reason so few SGC cards have been discovered so far. I collect SGC cards more than most but have to believe the cards that did not get graded from PSA in all of those submissions went to SGC. I imagine a decent percentage of those are in SGC graded holders.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
agree which actually makes the cards in their holders worth less in my eyes then PSA where you can at least partially check things out versus zero
Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 07-01-2019 at 10:13 AM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Did SGC articulate a rationale for moving away from sequential certs?
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cheerleader posts? The only guys crying are the people who must be holding loads of PSA cards. Their like little kids telling their mom "he did it to". The percentage of PSA graded duds is overall way greater than SGC. PSA stinks and some of you just want to cover up for the,. Disgrace. FRANK ANTHONY
|
![]() |
|
|