 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
03-27-2016, 03:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
poor 1933 goudey ruth opinion
Quote:
I'd wager someone would still pay $20-$30 if it were real. Last edited by BBB; 03-27-2016 at 03:18 PM. 
|
|
#3
03-27-2016, 03:29 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
If real, because it is a Goudey Babe, my guess is it would fetch at least $100. The card's back looks possibly legit, but the front scan is just too blurry to make a virtual judgement.
Brian
|
|
#4
03-27-2016, 03:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
goudey ruth
Pic
Last edited by Leon; 03-28-2016 at 07:51 AM. Reason: scan
|
|
#5
03-27-2016, 03:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
pic
Pic
Last edited by Leon; 03-28-2016 at 07:54 AM. Reason: scan size
|
|
#6
03-27-2016, 03:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
goudey ruth
Not for sale but fyi PSA 0 go for $1200
$20? Wow I wish could another one for that price.
|
|
#7
03-27-2016, 04:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
A poor condition Ruth may sell in the $1200 range if it presents well. I have been watching the 181 over the last several months and poor copies routinely break $1K, but they look great for the grade. I don't know how well that version sells because I am not interested in it, but although I don't doubt someone would pay $100 for one that bad, I am not sure why. Isn't one of the allures of a baseball card the appearance? I suppose filling a hole for a set is one reason, but jeez...
__________________
Looking for: Unique Steve Garvey items, select Dodgers Postcards & Team Issue photos
|
|
#8
03-29-2016, 07:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
goudey
Yes just like pope thread
Wanted to share my card and get Opnions but was only made fun of And insulted. Have a great day
|
|
#9
03-29-2016, 07:20 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Working on the 1957 Topps set.
|
|
#10
03-29-2016, 10:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
goudey
Just want share my card
For fun but got a bunch grief instead. Oh well
|
|
#11
03-29-2016, 03:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
yes
Yes perfect example regular post that where ruined and
Made fun of . Lots of fun Good luck
|
|
#12
03-29-2016, 03:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The personal insults were uncalled for but there does seem to be some disconnect from reality with your perceived value of the card. Not to mention the other strange threads.
When you post a picture asking for opinions, that's what you are going to get. If you don't want to hear everyone's opinion I would suggest not asking for it in the first place. I actually think your card has some value, more than anyone else who has commented in this thread in fact, just not nearly as much as you seem to think. Assuming it is real.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. Last edited by pokerplyr80; 03-29-2016 at 03:46 PM.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB 1933 Goudey Ruth #53 - Poor/Fair Graded | 25801wv | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-05-2015 06:48 PM |
| WTB Poor Grade 1933 Goudey Babe Ruth | g&m sales | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-13-2014 12:36 PM |
| FS: 33 Goudey Ruth and 34 Goudey Gehrig in poor condition | sylbry | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 06-22-2014 11:56 AM |
| WBT-TTTF 1933 Goudey #144 Babe Ruth Poor- scans of trade bait included | frankh8147 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-12-2013 11:56 AM |
| Napoleon (Larry) Lajoie 1933 Goudey POOR (not ruth) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 04-29-2004 08:18 AM |
Hybrid Mode
