 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
01-31-2013, 07:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Mr. Luckey, I would actually be very curious as to your opinion on this one in particular. Personally, I do not care about grades too much, and I do not know if you do, but what do you make of this? I have seen a card get docked heavily for a small amount of paper loss on the back, and I would like to use this one particular example if I may: http://goodwinandco.com/LotDetail.aspx?lotid=8289 The only real flaw on this Waddell that I can see is a small amount of paper loss on the back. I truly find the fact these cards (the Bresnahan I posted above and the Waddell) are considered "equals" in terms of condition to be nothing short of offensive. Maybe I am wrong here, but I just do not get it. I would truly appreciate your opinion on this subject, as these are just a few examples. Thank You Mr. Luckey, and to anyone else who would like to give their opinion. Derek Last edited by DerekMichael; 01-31-2013 at 07:37 PM. Reason: for my crappy grammar 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New to Boards and T206's | MBMiller25 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 05-18-2010 06:03 PM |
| Multiple Boards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-28-2005 09:33 AM |
| Any other boards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 12-04-2003 10:43 AM |
| SGC's New Message Boards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 02-14-2002 08:48 AM |
| 2 Boards ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-14-2001 05:36 PM |
Threaded Mode