 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
02-25-2023, 05:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
This is why TPGs should use a minimum size requirement for cards with RAZOR sharp corners.
If the card doesn't meet the minimum size requirement and it has RAZOR sharp corners, then have a QUALIFIER that indicates it doesn't meet the minimum size requirement but has been graded as if it were. That would put the thought in everyone's mind that it could be trimmed (which it probably is). Think about it. When you look at the number of cards out there and find that a large number of high grade cards doesn't meet the minimum size requirement, then people may start asking why most cards with lower grades meet the size requirement but higher graded cards do not. I mean really? Are we this stupid?
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB/Seeking Trade For: T206 Walter Johnson Portrait (SGC Heavily Preferred) | MailboxBaseball | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 07-29-2017 11:13 AM |
| WTB: Chopped or Heavily Miscut Dodgers or Dodgers with Crazy Printing Anomalies | 4reals | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 7 | 09-20-2013 07:16 PM |
| Heavily inscribed Ernie Banks Auto'd Ball | mickey7mantle7 | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 10-10-2009 10:13 PM |
| One idea, likely heavily flawed, for fixing some of the ills in our hobby | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 01-11-2007 01:44 PM |
| too bad this card is so heavily trimmed... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-27-2003 06:03 PM |
Threaded Mode